RE: [XTalk] Re: Proof
That last paragraph or two didn't make a lot of sense when I read it again.
<At least I am consistent when it comes to senselessness>
>>It seems to me that we should really consider possibility and plausibilityas related, and differentiate this set of constructs from probability.<,
This did not cohere with the following:
>>POSSIBLEPROBABLE (in cases where statistical proofs can be calculated)
PLAUSIBLE (in all other cases, including historical)<<
The latter is what I intended to say. Probability and plausibility are
subsets of possible things.
>>Someday, if I can ever find the time, I hope to look into this matter mushmore seriously. The "if" part is the killer ... <<
"Mush" like my brain. That should have been "much."
Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- I know this is off topic, however, during the past few days I noticed the
discussion going on about the use of copyrighhted material. Anyway, my
question is this, how do I properly cite a web page I used information from
in an academic paper. I am a student and an interested historical Jesus
individual. I realize this is off topic so please send reply to me off the
Thomas G. Barnes