8605Re: [XTalk] Dating of GMark
- Dec 3, 2001"Michael A. Turton" wrote:
>I don't want to appear to be defending the other thesis, but if Mark's
> Some commentators argue that Simon cannot be historical because Mark
> says he was "coming in from the fields/country" and a Jew would not be
> working on a high holy day. How do you respond to that?
CHRONOLOGY (not quite the same thing as his historicity) is correct then
ALL the Jews in Mark's account have violated the high holy day.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>