Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

RE: Secret Mark

Expand Messages
  • joe baxter
    A few thoughts about the Secret Mark discussion: 1. Much thanks to Wieland for his website. 2. My sympathies go with the authenticity of Secret Mark. Still,
    Message 1 of 37 , Dec 4, 1998
      A few thoughts about the Secret Mark discussion:

      1. Much thanks to Wieland for his website.

      2. My sympathies go with the authenticity of Secret Mark. Still, there are
      so many suspicious circumstances associated with that document. The Hobbs
      discussion on Wieland's website is very informative. Apparently, a number of
      scholars do suspect a forgery on Smith's part. Jim West has plenty of
      respected company.

      3. So much is suspicious about the Secret Mark. The plan seems all too
      perfect. Only a scrap of the Secret Gospel is found. To forge the whole
      Gospel would not have been possible. Just by coincidence, the fragment
      explains why it was lost. The Gospel was itself secret. Clement himself said
      to hide the truth. This is all much too pat. And how about the way the
      fragment ends. Clement is about to explain everything.

      4. Not a single reference to this alleged Clement letter or the Secret
      Gospel is known in history; and the book in which Morton Smith found the
      letter at the Mar Saba monastery was not listed in any previous catalog of
      that monastery.

      5.Morton Smith made no effort whatever toward conservation of the
      manuscript, nor has the document apparently been seen or brought to light
      for testing and analysis by anyone else. There is no evidence beyond M
      Smith's word that he found the old book in the monastery. He kept the matter
      secret for 14 years, then published two books, a "scholarly" one and a
      "popular" one. This 14 year wait seems very convenient. If someone went to
      the Monastery and couldn't find the book, Smith would have a good
      explanation. The book was moved. The former librarian, or the former abbot
      is no longer there. Etc. No other person has ever been able to locate the
      book in which this stuff was
      supposedly written.

      6.Note also how Smith dedicated his book on the Secret Gospel, cryptically,
      "To the one who knows"; he never disclosed who this person was or what this
      person knew.

      7. I haven't read Smith's work, Jesus The Magician, but if the title conveys
      its contents, it suggests that Smith is attracted by sacred trickery.

      8. I don't accept the idea that Smith couldn't have pulled something like
      this off. This type of thing is done all the time with artwork. Rembrandt
      forgeries which can pass for an original, and fool many of the experts, do
      appear. Smith was apparently a brilliant man. Only someone quite brilliant
      could do something like this. So what if he needed help. Maybe that's "The
      one who knows."

      9. The absence of the MS, and the inability of anyone to verify the truth is
      certainly consistent with forgery.

      10. I don't accept your argument stemming from the allegedly hurried way the
      MS was placed in the back of an old book. Who was in a hurry? Supposedly the
      prior copy had been rotting away for centuries. And so about a million days
      pass, and what happens, on the millionth day the monastery is suddenly out
      of paper? So they toss this rare MS which raises some of the most profound
      questions in the history of Christianity, and make a copy, and where do
      they put the copy of this rare MS? On a flap in the back of a book?

      11. The current absence, of course, can also be explained by other factors.
      Possibly the monastery or the Patriarchate are themselves suspicious about
      this MS and want to pull the MS from circulation. As for conspiracy
      theorizing, isn't the Vatican always suspected in these matters? Doesn't the
      secret Vatican library contain the full version of the Gospel of the
      Hebrews, and Q also? Didn't they snatch the Himis MS discovered by Nicolas
      Notovich? (:>

      With kind regards,

    • Philip B. Lewis
      Jack Kilmon s speculation today about the motives of the Patriarchate for squirreling away the famous Clenetine letter prompt me to add another consideration
      Message 37 of 37 , Dec 10, 1998
        Jack Kilmon's speculation today about the motives of the Patriarchate for
        "squirreling away" the famous Clenetine letter prompt me to add another
        consideration to the ms interest,

        First, I have no doubt that M. Smith discovered a real document. And I
        would not question the judgment of those who had seen the PHOTOGRAPHS Smith
        provided, that the letter was authentically Clement's. That said:

        Has anyone done a study of the photographic film/plates used? Was it
        orthochromatic or panchromatic? How was it developed? In what solution?
        What lens/camera was used? What FILTRATION was used to make the record?
        From the photos of the document in my 1st edn _Secret Gospel_ the details
        are NOT that clear. It is clear that natural light was used for taking the
        photos. Anyone who has done any photocopying knows that filters HAD to be
        used to distinguish letters in a 200 year old volume. Note that the book
        print itself is quite legible; the copied pages leave something to be desired.

        This has nothing to do with Smith's integrity; I have never doubted it. It
        raises questions of how much of the bracketing [] Smith provided "to make
        the meaning clear" was necessary because of image-lacunae which can occur
        when copying is inexpertly done.

        Anyone able to provide the verification of the photographing process?

        + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
        "History is the phenomenon living people invent
        and create to establish who they are
        based on what they think they were in the past."
        -- Linda Schele
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.