Re: Thoughts of GosThom
- On 30 Sep 98 at 20:27, Andrew Bernhard wrote:
> We should note Fitzmeyer's comment here: "[Grenfell and Hunt] noted that theThanks for this -- I had not noticed this before.
> preserved part of the saying 'agrees exactly with the wording of' Lk 6:42.
> However, a glance at a modern critical text of the the NT reveals that the
> infinitive is found at the end of the verse. A. von Harnack explained the
> discrepancy, nopting that 'recent editors, following their preference for B,
> have put ekbalein at the end, whereas all other Uncials, and also the Coptic
> version show the word where we find it in the Papyrus'. This being so, the
> relation of the Oxyrhynchus logoi to the Lucan version is clear."
> ("Oxyrhynchus Logoi and the Coptic Gospel of Thomas" 390-391)
>Indeed. It is worth noting, though, that the clear indication is that what
> Fitzmeyer also notes that the conjunction kai does not correspond to the
> Coptic, but it does correspond to the canonical parallels. It is extremely
> unfortunate that we do not have more of this fragment as the possibility that
> the verbatim agreement was even lengthier seems very possible.
came before P Oxy 1.1-4 must have corresponded closely to Luke 6.42 & par. The
sentence is constructed differently in Greek and Coptic. The latter (saying
26) has HOTAN . . . TOTE, "When . . . then". Oxyrhynchus, like Luke 6.42 &
par., has: [imperative] . . . KAI TOTE, "[First take . . . .] and then",
unless anyone can think of anything else that could have stood before KAI TOTE.
This is an indication that this most extensive of the verbatim agreements was
even more striking before the papyrus was damaged.
Dr Mark Goodacre mailto:M.S.Goodacre@...
Dept. of Theology Tel: +44 (0)121 414 7512
University of Birmingham Fax: +44 (0)121 414 6866
Birmingham B15 2TT
World Without Q: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/q
- Dear Rene:
I think it has a much simpler answer: Nobody cares what gender anybody is.
Why should they? You pick the most likely, that's all. I cannot imagine
that the distinction, if known would alter any item in the ongoing
At 07:49 AM 10/22/98 -0700, you wrote:
> This disembodied forum of cyberspace, where all is transmitted via____________________________________
>printed word, can lead to amusing curiosities such as myself
>being referred to lately on Crosstalk as "she" and even most recently
>"Renee" (contrary to the evidence!) when I am in fact quite happily
>male... :) No apologies are in order by anyone except myself for not
>putting "Mr." in front of the name.
> It just goes to show how easy it is for all of us to go beyond the
> I'll be posting more GTh-Synoptic parallel statistics in the next 24
>386 E. 29th Ave.
>Eugene OR USA 97405
>Tel: (541) 686-0296
Michael T. MacDonell, Ph.D.
Doctoral Student in Biblical Studies
Trinity College and Seminary