Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

3859Re: Foreign territory

Expand Messages
  • Mark Goodacre
    Dec 2, 1998
    • 0 Attachment
      Thanks for the interesting and useful post. A partial and inadequate answer to
      the final question would be that most would put some of the anti-Capernaum
      material down to Luke's source material, either Q or Matthew, especially
      10.13-16 (Woe to you Chorazin . . .).

      A small synoptic comment too on the other data:

      On 2 Dec 98 at 3:57, rene joseph salm wrote:

      > ------
      >
      > Mk. 6:1 "He went away from there and came to his own country..."
      >
      > Mt.13:53 "... and coming to his own country, he taught them..."
      >
      > Lk. 4:16 "And he came to Nazareth, *where he had been brought up*,..."
      >
      > ------
      > Mt.4:12-13 "... he withdrew into Galilee; and leaving Nazareth, he went
      > and dwelt in Capernaum..."
      >
      > Lk.4:14 "And J returned by the power of the spirit into Galilee..."
      >
      > -----

      The compilation of parallels here might be re-worked a little with the
      observation that Matt. 4.13 // Luke 4.16 have the unique spelling Nazara,
      usually held to be a sign either of Luke's dependence on Matthew (e.g. Goulder)
      or a sign of Matthew and Luke's mutual dependence on Q (e.g. Schurmann,
      Tuckett, Robinson). The latter causes big problems for the Q theory and it is
      one of the reasons that Q theorists are only tentative about its inclusion.

      Mark
      --------------------------------------
      Dr Mark Goodacre mailto:M.S.Goodacre@...
      Dept of Theology tel: +44 121 414 7512
      University of Birmingham fax: +44 121 414 6866
      Birmingham B15 2TT United Kingdom

      Homepage: http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/goodacre
    • Show all 20 messages in this topic