Thank you, Chris Sharp!
- Chris wrote on Todd's list, in part:
> Message 12295 of 12302I really like that example! :o)
> From: "csharpdotcom"
> Date: Sat Aug 2, 2003 5:06 pm
> Subject: The slippery slope of using
> science to support the Bible
> I have serious problems with people
> claiming scientific foreknowledge of
> information that was not known until
> modern times.
> As far as I know, but I stand corrected
> if anybody can pull out any contrary
> information, all passages which can be
> interpreted to meam the author had
> scientific foreknowledge are either
> ambigous, and can be interpreted in
> various ways, or the author did have
> the knowledge, but not supernaturally.
> An example for the former are the paths
> in the seas. . .