Re: [creationevolutiondebate] Re: Define "Theory of Evolution"
- In a message dated 7/1/01 12:02:56 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
What I mean by it is a rigorous (in Euclidean space) method for
constructing a circle of the same area as a given square (or vice
versa), using only a compass and straight-edge.
Ah, Dave, you're spoiling my fun. <g>
"Mere unbelief in a personal god is no philosophy at all."- Albert Einstein
- On 20 Jul 2001, at 0:02, tclifton@... wrote:
>You are. YOUR god is a liar, pure and simple. According to your
> Who is calling God the liar when they scorn and mock His very words as
> to how He says He did things? Tim
"science" your god is playing a motion picture on an invisible event
horizon of events that never occurred. And then YOU allege that
this deity wrote Genesis and that YOUR interpretation of it is the
only correct one and that YOUR god therefore is a liar in the
creation but truthful in the book and that only the gnostics who
believe the book over the creation can know the truth.
Of course this is YOUR god. It is not the God of Jesus Christ and
not even the God the Bible teaches of when you read it as a whole
and understand who wrote it, when and why.
Now, in the 1500's, you would be burned at the stake for
suggesting such ideas (and believe me, Luther and Calvin would be
holding the torches for the Inquisitors on this one!), but we live in a
more tolerant age where heretics are merely exposed, not burned...
Of course God didn't write Genesis and it is your private
interpretation of it that is the real lie.