Re: Teaching creationism is child abuse
- Hi Carol,
I think we should follow the Golden Rule (and similar axiomatic systems). So it would be OK if they didn't harm someone else. Harming someone else would include telling children that it's perfectly normal, when science tells us that no other mammal is ***EXCLUSIVELY*** homosexual. It's a wierd experiment on children, and it violates the Golden Rule.
--- In email@example.com, "HumanCarol" wrote:
> "kurt31416" wrote:
> > How about you Dave? How do you feel about teaching children that homosexuality is ok? ... <<
> What is the alternative? That homosexuality is not OK?
> If that is the alternative, upon what would such a teaching be based?
> -----Original Message-----YOU made a claim. I asked you to support it and you asked me a facetious
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 2:06 AM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: [creationevolutiondebate] Re: Teaching creationism is child abuse
> Knda shallow there Dave. You are turning into a real disappointment.
question instead. That told me where YOU stand. You can dissemble all you
like, but your feline is unsacked.