Re: Cambrian Distinguishes Evolution Science & ID Pseudoscience
> > > Michael:Tin: Real science explains facts.
> > >
> > > 1. Go ahead. Using random mutations and natural selection explain
> > > the appearance of the Ediacara and Cambrian organisms.Tin: You first Mr. Double Standard weasel.
> Using the scientific principles of ???
> and ??? explain the timing of the appearance
> of the mostly marine of the invertebrates from
> 500 million years ago. And while you are
> at it be sure to explain Small Bilaterian Fossils
> found from 40 to 55 Million Years Before the Cambrian
> Then go on to use these yet to
> be found scientific principles to
> explain other parts of the Cambrian.
> For example why we never find in the Cambrian
> land plants,
> primitive mammals,
> or any modern mammal of any kind.
> Which means no:
> You are reminded YET AGAIN that
> evolution explains these patterns by
> saying that these more complex life forms
> had not evolved yet. Consistent
> with the overall simple before complex
> evolutionary requirement.
> More specifically evolution
> explains the following Cambrian
> fossil facts:
> Modern humans don't appear because
> people evolved from hominids and
> hominids had not evolved yet.
> Hominids don't appear because
> they evolved from other modern
> mammals and modern mammals had not
> evolved yet.
> Modern mammals don't appear because
> modern mammals evolved from primitive mammals and
> primitive mammals had not evolved yet.
> Primitive mammals don't appear because
> primitive mammals evolved from reptiles and
> reptiles had not evolved yet.
> Reptiles don't appear because reptiles
> evolved from amphibians and amphibians had
> not evolved yet.
> Anybody want to guess what order
> these life form appear in when they do
> appear in fossil record ?
Creationism denies them.