persisting despite clear findings of error....was: Liars..
- LA> The "bad thing" is to persist in an idea in SPITE of the clear scientific findings that repudiate that idea. It them becomes a vehicle to promote error, confusion and falsehoods.Pi:That applies to all of the current creation "science" models of which I'm aware including:1) Barry Setterfield's c-decay.2) Dr. Russell Humphreys' white holes.3) Dr. Jason Lisle's anisotropic synchrony4) Dr. Larry Vardiman's vapor canopy.5) Dr. John Baumgardner's runaway subduction.6) Dr. Walt Brown's hydroplates.Among these models are some (such as c-decay) that even the creationist ministries say should not be used; others (such as white holes and the vapor canopy) that even the author admits will not work; and several (such as vapor canopy, runaway subduction, and hydroplates) that, if true, would sterilize the planet. (I can think of little that would more effectively refute a scientific model than the fact it would destroy all life on Earth.).Laurie claims to want creation "science" taught in public schools, yet he has never proposed a single current creation "science" model that should be presented in public schools ..... let attempt a defense of such model in this forum.Not once. Ever.Prediction: Laurie will now present some statement of opinion, likely of debates that happened over a decade before most of these models were even introduced, as evidence against "evolutionism." This despite the fact that Laurie has openly acknowledged that opinion is NOT evidence.It must really suck to be Laurie.
- From: Dave Oldridge <doldridg@...>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 8:56 AM
Subject: RE: [creation_evolution_debate] persisting despite clear findings of error....was: Liars..