Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: MORE QUESTIONS that People Ask Creation Jihadists.

Expand Messages
  • dinohunter72
    ... DINOHUNTER: Any luck finding that evidence I ve been asking you for Laurie?
    Message 1 of 88 , Dec 4, 2012
    • 0 Attachment
      --- In creation_evolution_debate@yahoogroups.com, "Laurie Appleton" <lappleto@...> wrote:
      >
      >
      > ----- Original Message -----
      > From: gabevee
      > To: creation_evolution_debate@yahoogroups.com
      > Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 3:03 AM
      > Subject: [creation_evolution_debate] Re: MORE QUESTIONS that People Ask Creation Jihadists.
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > --- In creation_evolution_debate@yahoogroups.com, "D R Lindberg" <dr.lindberg@> wrote:
      > >
      > >
      > > --- In creation_evolution_debate@yahoogroups.com, "Laurie Appleton"
      > > <lappleto@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > . . . .
      > > > >
      > > > > LA> How is it that you don't believe what noted evolutionists have
      > > admitted?
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > DRL: I have been hearing on the radio recently about all the
      > > record companies that turned down the Beatles when they were starting
      > > because their "experts" said there was no future for that band.
      > > >
      > > > I remember back about 1956 when all the experts told us that
      > > Rock'n'Roll would be forgotten in six months.
      > > >
      > > > I remember back even further, around 1952 I think, when the experts
      > > were telling us that we would all be driving atomic-powered cars in five
      > > years.
      > > >
      > > > Then there was the Hollywood expert that said that the young Clark
      > > Gable had no future as future as an actor.
      > > >
      > > > And of course Lord Kelvin the greatest physicist of his day who said
      > > that heavier than air flight was impossible.
      > > >
      > > > Experts can always be wrong.
      > > >
      > > > Forget about experts. Look at evidence.
      > > >
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > LA> Perhaps you should make a distinction about who you refer to as
      > > "experts"? Experts on predictions about "Beatles" must surely be
      > > significantly "different" from expert on evolutionism? When it comes to
      > > scientific evidence, we find that the evolutionary experts have admitted
      > > that the Creation scientists regularly "routed" their evolutionary
      > > opponents on the scientific questions. e.g.;
      > >
      > > And no one is as much an expert at missing the point as you are.
      > >
      > > I guess that's something to be proud of.
      > >
      >
      > Yeah, Laurie. Are you going to fixate on that now wrt DRL as you do about whatever kind of music you imagine Isaac likes and miss the actual point altogether?
      >
      > Or are you going to see how futile this tactic of yours is among those here with, as Susan put it, a modicum of intelligence?
      >
      > Your tactics are as transparent as the air, or as toothless Frankie Chihuahua's visible light.
      >
      > GV
      >
      >
      >
      > LA> It is a shame that you do not seem able to leave anything above that level of comment. It becomes a question then of whether you, or Susan or Linberg actually have that "modicum of intelligence" after all.
      >
      >
      > Laurie.
      >
      > "From my earliest training as a scientist, I was very strongly brainwashed
      > to believe that science cannot be consistent with any kind of deliberate
      > creation. That notion has had to be painfully shed.
      > (Chandra Wickramasinghe, noted astronomer and ex-atheist Buddhist, 1981)
      >
      > ..
      >
      >

      DINOHUNTER: Any luck finding that evidence I've been asking you for Laurie?
    • SH
      ... Tin: Well first of all visible light is well....visible. Ha, ha, ha. Visible light is not visible. ~ Frank, the goof.
      Message 88 of 88 , Dec 8, 2012
      • 0 Attachment
        >
        > "Visible light is invisible" in or out of context is plain WRONG.
        >
        > GV
        >
        > FRANKS REPLY : Do you have ANY IDEA what LIGHT is ???????


        Tin: Well first of all visible light is
        well....visible.


        Ha, ha, ha.


        "Visible light is not visible."
        ~ Frank, the goof.
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.