Re: Educating Laurie
- Hi Simpleton,
Laurie are you beginning to realize that you are merely a joke ?
"There is NO evolutionary order at all and never was." ~ Laurie
Appleton lying about the fossil record.
The Fossil Record
first bacteria before
first multicellular organisms before
first shelled organisms before
first insects before
first amphibians before
first reptiles before
first dinosaurs before
first birds before
first placental mammals before
first apes before
> PS> The irony here is that these 3 authorities, Einstein, Sagan&
> Johnson, are well respected authorities in physics orjurisprudence
> which have nothing to do with Biology. That makes as much senseas
> quoting Winston Churchill to make an argument about Art History.Tin: Yes, but you see Laurie is very stupid. He genuinely seems to
believe that even his most obvious logical fallacies are actually
fantastic arguments. In particular he enjoys the argument by
authority logical fallacy. Even after the fallacious nature of the
argument is pointed out to him, he will (very) simply repeat the
exact same argument. Utterly unchanged ! He can't understand why
everyone isn't running to his side. All that on top of the fact the
he misinterprets and misunderstands the quotes he uses.
Laurie is so stupid he's funny.
> LA> The same comment applies here too. Each ofthose "authorities"
> can be entirely capable of discuss many sorts of matters that areTin: But Mr. Simpleton when a person supplies an opinion outside
> outside their particular areas of specialty!
their area of expertise it is no longer an opinion that carries the
weight of an expert authority. It carries no more weight than any
one elses. Except maybe yours -- ha, ha, ha.
But due to your bulk stupidity you are doomed to make this same
thinking error over and over and over again. It's stuff like this
makes it impossible for any sane person to take you the least bit
seriously. But of course you are far to out of touch to have a clue.
Because you are a brainwashed zombie you are incapable of learning
from your mistakes.
Poor old Mr. Simpleton, you simply can't teach this old dog a new
".. there are NO real "beneficial" mutations at all " ~ Laurie
******* News from Laurie's Authorities at AiG *********
Which arguments should definitely not be used?
'There are no beneficial mutations.' This is not true, since some
changes do confer an advantage in some situations.
- On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Herbert herbborteck@... [creation_evolution_debate] <email@example.com> wrote:Reply;You are right. The slavery in the bible was different than the slavery in the US.However, the Jews were NEVER slaves in Egypt. That story is a mythical andfalse story.The Egyptians kept records denoting their history, and there is not any record ofHebrews being slaves.In fact, there were Semites that actually ruled Egypt for about 100 years.They were the Hyksos, a group of Semites that spoke a Semitic language.The Greek name "Hyksos" was coined by Manetho to identify the FifteenthDynasty of Asiatic rulers of northern Egypt. In Egyptian Hyksos means "ruler(s)of foreign countries".They were not the Hebrews. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origins_of_the_HyksosHerbWhy do you believe that? Here are the facts:
Egyptian history and the biblical record: a perfect match?
Advocates of chronological revision
This disquieting book draws attention … to a crucial period in world history, and to the very shaky nature of the dating, the whole chronological framework, upon which our current interpretations rest…the existing chronologies for that crucial phase in human history are in error by several centuries, and that, in consequence, history will have to be rewritten.3
Even when full use has been made of the king lists and of such subsidiary sources as have survived, the indispensable dynastic framework of Egyptian history shows lamentable gaps and many a doubtful attribution …What is proudly advertised as Egyptian history is merely a collection of rags and tatters.4
Reasons for questioning the traditional Egyptian timeline
Historical sources for Egyptian chronology
Noah’s link to Egypt
Egypt is called Mestraim by the Hebrews; and Mestraim lived not long after the flood. For after the flood, Cham (or Ham), son of Noah, begat Aeguptos or Mestraim, who was the first to set out to establish himself in Egypt, at the time when the tribes began to disperse this way and that…Mestraim was indeed the founder of the Egyptian race; and from him the first Egyptian Dynasty must be held to spring.8
Both articles are part of an expanding body of evidence that links the period once known as ‘predynastic’ so firmly to the ages of the pyramids and later, that the term should be abandoned.9
He communicated to them arithmetic, and delivered to them the science of astronomy; for before Abram came into Egypt they were unacquainted with those parts of learning; for that science came from the Chaldeans into Egypt.12
No one was unhappy in my days, not even in the years of famine, for I had tilled all the fields of the Nome of Mah…thus I prolonged the life of its inhabitants and preserved the food which it produced.12
It is apparent that the Asiatics were present in the town in some numbers, and this may have reflected the situation elsewhere in Egypt. It can be stated that these people were loosely classed by Egyptians as ‘Asiatics’, although their exact homeland in Syria or Palestine cannot be determined … The reason for their presence in Egypt remains unclear.15
Now there arose a new king over Egypt who did not know Joseph, and he said to his people, ‘Look, the people of the children of Israel are more and mightier than we’…Therefore they set taskmasters over them to afflict them with their burdens…And they made their lives bitter with hard bondage… (Exodus 1:8-14).
The scattered documentation gives no clear answer as to how or why the Asiatics came to Egypt in the Middle Kingdom…There is nevertheless firm literary evidence that Asiatic slaves, women and children were at Gurob.16
Moses is born
… Plague stalks through the land and blood is everywhere … Nay, but the river is blood. Does a man drink from it? As a human he rejects it. He thirsts for water … Nay, but gates, columns and walls are consumed with fire…Nay but the son of the high-born man is no longer to be recognized … The stranger people from outside are come into Egypt … Nay, but corn has perished everywhere…Everyone says ‘there is no more.’20
It is evident that the completion of the king’s pyramid was not the reason why Kahun’s inhabitants eventually deserted the town, abandoning their tools and other possessions in the shops and houses …The quantity, range, and type of articles of everyday use which were left behind in the houses may suggest that the departure was sudden and unpremeditated.22
The Hyksos mystery solved
I know of no finding in archaeology that’s properly confirmed which is in opposition to the scriptures. The Bible is the most accurate history textbook the world has ever seen.24