G Cannot.....Biblical Flat Earth Movement.....Re: Extremely Disappointing.
>>> Gabor:Gabor is clearly responsible for the abuse he gets.
>>> I asked you if in the DNA changes are combinations or
>>> permutations, since I am not well versed in genetics.
>> Randy C:
>> NO KIDDING.
>>> On the other hand I posted that probability math uses
>>> factorials as well as exponantials [sic] to calculate
>>> the results. now you recall two posts in which Randy
>>> the way tipically [sic] evo talking down style, declares
>>> how "clueless" Gabor is in "math".
> If you knew what you were talking about wouldn't you be
> able to EXPLAIN how factorials can be something other
> than wrong ?
**IF** you post a mathematical "challenge" to evolution
that involves genetics, but you don't understand genetics,
then you will look stupid and ignorant when you are
asked questions about that "challenge".
**IF** you don't want to look stupid and ignorant, then
you have two alternatives:
1. Learn about genetics.
2. Don't post the "challenge".
Then if you try to simply bluff your way through the
questions, as Gabor does, you won't fool anyone. So
you'll just make yourself look more and more stupid and
Gabor acts SO offended when people call him stupid and
ignorant. Then he goes out of his way to prove that he
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "gabor horvath" <gabor.horvath@...> wrote:
>DINOHUNTER: But Gabor, what data do you have that proves evolution false?
> Randy C:
> He tries to use the "argument from authority". He finds
> someone who seems to have a good reputation and who seems
> to say something that agrees with him and he posts a link
> to a web page.
> But there is another reason why Gabor is a complete fraud.
> When the argument from authority goes AGAINST him, he
> feels completely free to dismiss the argument without
> Devastating logic Randy. I mean to your own ideas. Do you expect me to search for data which support evolutionism and if I do not do that, you call me `` a fraud``?? Really smashing ``logic`` I mean ill-logic of course. Have you ever posted articles against the ``theory of evolution`` ? Think again evo ``logician`will you? Thanks and good night.