Re: It is fun.....enjoy evolution proof.
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, eduard at home
> > > eduard ---
> > > And now you are doing what every other Creationist on this
> list seems to be into ... making accusations with nothing
> to support them. It's most unfortunate, since I had the feelingthat
> > you were somehow different. Your accusation that the theory ofhave
> > evolution is based on nothing but lies, shows that you do not
> a clue of what the theory is about. It also shows that you areevidence
> incapable of
> > > proper debate.
> > >
> > xdrohyx ---
> > So, you're stating that it's ok for textbooks to continue to use
> > Haekel's Embryonic Evolution chart, drawings he CREATED, as
> > for evolution? Are you going to tell me that if a piece ofevidence
> > that was created, not observed is used as evidence, that's not aAre
> > lie? Come on, you're smarter than this.
> > eduard ---
> > No ... I did not say that. In any case evolution is not
> dependent upon Haekel's chart.
> > When are you going to explain how the local group of galaxies
> and their distances and the 100,000 light year diameter of the
> > Galaxy show that the universe is only 6000 years old.
> got ---
> You asked when Evolutionists lie, I gave you a specific example.
> you trying to get yourself out of having to admit Haekel was adirty,
> fraudulent, lying toad?get
> eduard ---
> I did not ask your examples. I asked when you were going to
> around to answering my galaxy distance question. You seem to beI've already answered that question, we don't have a good theory for
> ignoring it.
it, not that it means there isn't one. Your theory for it sucks, so
why do you keep hounding me about something you have NO evidence for?
- --- In email@example.com, "Randy Raymond"
> > > >>> MATT: Short quiz: Name the other two 'all girl groups' of
> > > > era,and
> > > >>> and which was the first.
> > > >>>
> > > >> Go-Go's, Bananarama, the Pointer susters. Go-Go's was first
> > > > wasplay
> > > >> also the first all girl band to write their own music and
> > > > theirposts
> > > >> own instruments.
> > > >> Dindy
> > > >
> > > > MATT: Make that four. The Bangles were just mentioned a few
> > > > ago which got me going on this, and then you have to throw inThe
> > > > Pointer Sisters for four. Stop it!. And I'm P-A proud.played
> > >
> > > BAKKE
> > > Do the Pointer Sisters qualify? I don't believe any of them
> > > instruments. They were all just singers, weren't they?refer
> > >
> > > If the Pointer Sisters qualify, shouldn't Heart also qualify?
> > >
> > I wondered about both, however, the term Girl Group is used to
> > to music groups made up of all females, whether they played theirgroup
> > instruments or not. The Pointer sisters are considered a girl
> > by most lexicons, just as the Ronettes and the Supremes areothers.
> > cinsidered a girl group.
> > And I thought about Heart, however, they came from the late 70's
> > rather than the 80's so weren't quite from the same era as the
> > Dindy**********************************************************************
> Randy:I got:
> Oh great! I just get "Who put the bomp..." out of my head and now
>Oooh. My hippo is really scared.
> My boyfriend's back and there's goin' to be trouuubble!
> Hey la, Hey la, my boyfriend's back!
> My lawyer tells me we can ask for double damages for early 60's girl
> group songs.