Re: [Covenanted Reformation] Re: Martin's post
- He took a shot at you for your spelling, true. And that does not constitute any argument worth responding to, I agree. But much of what he wrote was on point, requiring an answer regardless of his having fun with the spelling error. For my part, I'd rather the discussion die for now. But should you choose to respond (and it is your decision whether or not you do so... you are not required to answer everything or anything here), I'll be sure to read it.(back to moving furniture, rather, the furniture is moving my back).gmw.----- Original Message -----From: ColinSent: Friday, March 19, 2004 5:09 PMSubject: [Covenanted Reformation] Re: Martin's post--- In email@example.com, "gmw"
> What I will post is the link to one of the posts you didn't answer
> that I think needs to be addressed if you will insist on carrying
> this conversation on:
Gerry, when a man resorts to an opponent's spelling error as an
argument, particularly an ad hominem argument, like Martin did in the
above link, then he isn't worth taking seriously. This is why it
wasn't initially answered.
But for your sake, I will reply to his post later tonight.