Re: [Covenanted Reformation] Question for Covenanters
Thank you, Martin. I understand that position. However it doesn't
fully answer my question. Have you guys sworn the covenant or not?
If so, how?
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Martin"
> We are bound by the covenant whether we personally swear it or not.it?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dan Fraas" <fraasrd@y...>
> To: <email@example.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 12:09 PM
> Subject: [Covenanted Reformation] Question for Covenanters
> > If you are a "Covenanter", does that mean you and your family have
> > sworn the covenant? If so, did you read the full text of the SL&C
> > aloud during a profession of faith? Or where/how did you swear
> > If you didn't, could you if you wanted to?http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > For Christ's Crown and Covenant!
> > Riley
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > firstname.lastname@example.org
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
- "By the way, I am a US citizen, and do not believe I am bound to the
Only the federal government was originally bound by the
Constitution. Today it is treated as if it also binds all state,
county, and munincipal governments as well. It still does not bind
individuals. Otherwise you'd be required to tolerate free speech and
the free excercise of religion in your own house! The Constitution
is not a covenant that binds individuals, but a foundational law that
binds the government.
--- In email@example.com,
christ_saves_sinners <no_reply@y...> wrote:
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, Thomas Rocheare
> <tertullianus_2000@y...> wrote:
> > Various honest covenanter questions:
> > 1) Can the SL&C contain error? If it can, who has the
> > authority to recognize that error, and revise the
> > covenant, releasing those bound by that covenant from
> > continued adherence to those aspects now recognized as
> > false?
> > 2) Can the President of the USA, and/or the Congress
> > of the USA, bind Americans today and their posterity
> > with a new covenant? If not, why not?
> I agreed with all "gwm" said, and would like to add, has not the US
> already bound its citizens and their posterity to a Covenant? We
> bound, according to the US magistrate, to uphold the USConstitution
> and Bill of Rights. In other words, they seem to think so. If youthe
> are a US citizen, do you believe you are bound to the US
> Constitution? If not, why not?
> By the way, I am a US citizen, and do not believe I am bound to the
> US Constitution. It is an unlawful Constitution, not recognizing
> Christ as King, nor the promotion and protection of His religion,
> and it underminds a better covenant, namely the SL&C. If the US
> decided to start all over, and so the "new" Constitution was
> contained a lesser degree of quality and quantity, people would
> think that to be absurd. So do I believe it absurd for the US to
> ignore their covenant obligations by writing something to a lesser
> degree of quality and quantity. This does not make me unbound to
> lawful perpetual promises my fathers recognized were required of
> them in the Scriptures.
> Thanks for the sincere questions,
> -Shawn Anderson
> Albany CRPC