Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [Covenanted Reformation] Re: Premillennialism and Confession

Expand Messages
  • Mark Ennis
    Colin, Yeah, thanks for the reply. I know there were some premillennialists at the Westminster Assembly so maybe they thought these statements allowed for
    Message 1 of 1 , Nov 3, 2002
      Yeah, thanks for the reply.  I know there were some premillennialists at the Westminster Assembly so maybe they thought these statements allowed for them, but I just do not see how. It teaches a single day of judgment, a single resurrection and a single judgment.  I agree with you that the BPC and APC were more consistent in changing their standards.
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: Colin
      Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 5:01 PM
      Subject: [Covenanted Reformation] Re: Premillennialism and Confession

      --- In covenantedreformationclub@y..., "Mark Ennis" <kurios22@c...>
      > Does anyone else think the Westminster Confession statements on the
      > last Things rules out premillennialism altogether?


      > How would a premillennialist pass an ordination exam or claim full
      > subscription?

      I'm not sure how most presbyterian churches allow a Chiliast to
      subscribe to the WCF except with making exceptions. The Free
      Presbyterian church of Ulster affirms liberty in the area of
      eschatology. (eg. Dr. Ian Paisley is a Premill, while other elders
      are Amill and some are postmill).

      The Bible Presbyterian Church under McIntire revised their american
      confession and catechisms in 1938 to make it conform to

      The tiny American Presbyterian Church which follows the same revised
      WCF and is premillennial and denies eschatological liberty. They

      "Reformed theology and Reformed churches have never had a unified
      position on eschatology (Greek for the doctrine of future things).
      The Reformed churches of the continent have traditionally favored
      amillennialism.  Presbyterian churches have for the most part
      historically favored postmillennialism.  All three positions were
      represented at the Westminster assembly and such noted personages as
      Dr. Twisse, the moderator, and Goodwin, the Independent, were
      premillennialists.  The Westminster standards therefore allow for all
      three and basically take a position of eschatological liberty."

      [I disagree with the last sentence if it sanctions premillennialism]

      They further write:

      "Unlike the bulk of their Presbyterian brethren, the American
      Presbyterian Church confesses historic premillennialism as its
      creed.  The Church therefore made a conscious decision not to adopt a
      position of eschatological liberty." 

      IMO the premillennial BPC and APC are more consistent in revising
      their WCF to conform to premillennialism than those presbyterian
      bodies which do not and merely permit the chiliast view as one
      legitimate view among many.

      Colin Tayler

      To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

      Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.