Re: PCA, OPC and other Presbyterian churches
- Thanks for helping me understand a little better. And thanks for the
welcome. Will now disappear into the woodwork and read until another
question comes to mind. Nice group you have here. Ever been to the
Reformation Nation group? Just joined that one and the Puritans mind
forum. Lot of good reading on the internet.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "gmw"
> --- In email@example.com, George Costanza
> <FriendofJerryS@g...> wrote:
> > New here so I would like to say hello to all
> Hello, and welcome.
> > and to ask as I have been
> > watching this discussion concerning the RPCNA and the RPNA get
> > heated as to what are the opinions here of the PCA and the OPCchurch.
> > I get the idea from some of the comments I have read that mostin
> > here don't think to much about either one or their members.
> Just my own opinion here, but there are good things about those
> churches that I very much appreciate, and I've been blessed through
> writings of folks from both of those churches. I don't personally
> know members of those churches, so I can't comment on their members,
> but it would be jackass foolish to write them off automatically, now
> wouldn't it? I'm sure there are some fine people in both of those
> > Do you
> > consider those who are in these churches as being apostates
> Apostates as in outright departing from the faith? Of course not.
> Did they depart from some of the truths once held by Presbyterians,
> yes, I believe so. I'm not comfortable with the label of apostate
> such cases, though.result
> > and doomed
> As in teaching damnable heresies that if they are believed will
> in all the members of those churches burning in Hell? Oh, no nono.
> I hope to see many many OPC and PCA members in Heaven.brothers
> > or are they your brothers and sisters in Christ?
> I consider all those professing the Protestant Faith to be my
> and sisters (or at least sons of my mother!).you
> > What if someone does not hold to the position of Covenanting as
> > do or not at all, does that make such a one an enemy?biblically
> Not in and of itself, necessarily, especially not in a day when the
> covenants in question are (sadly) long forgotten. But if a
> faithful covenant was adopted by a nation and a church, and membersof
> that nation and church refused that covenant (which in essence is athe
> refusal to adhere to and defend the true religion), you have to at
> least wonder what's up. Gillespie's quote is in such a context --
> nation and the church swore to defend the Protestant Religion, andbe
> some refused and reproached and railed against it. What else could
> thought of such people?