Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [Covenanted Reformation]The Lord's Hatred of Divorce

Expand Messages
  • Adam J. Boone
    actually she is towing the Protestant Reformed church s line. She offered englesma s paper as her proof. I whole heartedly disagree w/ the paper...just thought
    Message 1 of 18 , Nov 16, 2004
    • 0 Attachment
      actually she is towing the Protestant Reformed church's line. She
      offered englesma's paper as her proof. I whole heartedly disagree w/
      the paper...just thought i'd let you know that it does have
      a "reformed" connection.
      adam
      --- In covenantedreformationclub@yahoogroups.com, covie1646
      <no_reply@y...> wrote:
      >
      > Maria,
      >
      > I cannot improve upon what has been said here by the Covenanters.
      > Their voices certainly join with the voices of Covenanters past and
      > even fully and faithfully reflect the Word of God. Your argument,
      > Maria, has failed to show that God requires unconditional
      submission
      > of wife to husband and that remarriage after divorce is
      categorically
      > unlawful. I've studied different churches that claim the
      > name "Reformed" or "Presbyertian", and there is no Reformed
      > Presbyterian (or even a Hugenot church) church (except for the
      > backslidden ones such as the PCUSA possibly) that would agree with
      > your position in their position papers and teachings. The only
      group
      > of Christians that would agree with your position would be the
      modern
      > churches of the (Ana)Baptists of the name "Fundamental Baptists"
      > or "Independent Fundamental Baptists". Your position, Maria, is
      > nothing more than a variant of the position held by the Papist,
      anti-
      > Christian church.
      >
      > What Triune God of the Bible would have a person give higher
      loyalty
      > and following to her husband than Him to the extent of disobeying
      > Him?! That is tatamount to idolatry quite similar to the Papist
      > idolatries of giving obedience and greater loyalty to the "Marian"
      > apparitions (or rather angels of darkness) to the extent of
      > disobeying God. I must also ask what is the 1st greatest
      commandment?
      >
      > Whit
      >
      > --- In covenantedreformationclub@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew Clements"
      > <andrew_clements@h...> wrote:
      > >
      > >
      > > Martin,
      > >
      > > "Which of the following is a women to submit to from her husband
      so
      > > long
      > >
      > > as the husband is "willing to live with her":
      > >
      > > 1) Against the 6th commandment: being beaten, even unto serious
      > > injury or death.
      > >
      > > It has nothing to do with her choice. She is accountable for what
      > > she does before God.
      > >
      > > 2) Against the 7th commandment: being molested, raped or
      sodomized.
      > >
      > > What is your point? She is still to submit, is her submission
      > > conditional?
      > >
      > > 3) Having 1 or/and 2 done to her children."
      > >
      > > Are you talking in the context of a Christian marriage? Highly
      > > Unlikely!!!!
      > >
      > > If you are talking about the non-elect, they are also obligated
      to
      > > obey God's commandments, just like all men, we will all have to
      > > stand before the judgement seat of God.
      > >
      > > I can not believe that Christians actually speak in this manner,
      it
      > > is FLAT OUT EVIL. Disgraceful!
      > >
      > > The pharisee also add and subtracted to God's word to trap and
      > > ensnare.
      > >
      > > I am not naive, I am very much aware of the depravity of man. It
      > is
      > > all around us in society and in the bible. Be remained that you
      > > are addressing a Christian woman. I am not a man. I don't care
      for
      > > your tone of voice and the way in which you are speaking to me.
      > >
      > > Like I said before, I welcome anyone who is sincerely open to the
      > > subject of remarriage to e-mail me privately.
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > End of argument.
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > Marie.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.