Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Thoughts on Hort from Rome

Expand Messages
  • forisraelssake
    ... the ... when I ... know ... and ... want ... posts to ... I think there has been nothing going on so far that would have warranted a moderator s
    Message 1 of 3 , Sep 26, 2004
    • 0 Attachment
      > Paul, if you could pass on to your friend my apologies. I am not
      > best group moderator you'll ever come across. Sometimes I act
      when I
      > shouldn't, and don't act when I should. In this case, I do not
      > very much about the topic at hand or of the persons being quoted,
      > so I was allowing the conversation to continue between more
      > knowledgable folks, none of which have asked that the discussion be
      > quelled, in fact, the most recent post in the thread included "I
      > to thank you for your posts."
      > Is your friend a member here, or have you been forwarding the
      posts to
      > him?
      > gmw.

      I think there has been nothing going on so far that would have
      warranted a moderator's intervention.

      Of the principal names we have been discussing so far, Dr. F.J.A.
      Hort was a famous Cambridge scholar in the second half of the 19th
      century, and he (with Dr Westcott) constructed a well-edited text of
      the Greek New Testament that set a new standard in precision and
      exactitude according to the principles of textual criticism that had
      been developing in the preceding 150 years. He wrote a companion
      volume to his GNT, explaining the principles he used and justifying
      why he did not make much use of the Majority Text, which he regarded
      as late (the patristic argument), secondary (the conflation
      argument), and inferior (the internal evidence argument).

      This book is back in print:

      Drs. Westcott and Hort were members of the Revision committee that
      edited a new Greek New Testament and revised the translation of the
      1769 edition of KJV into a new edition that was published in its
      entirety in 1885 and was republished in the USA with minor revisions
      as the American Standard Version (ASV) of 1901.

      The RV is in print in an interlinear format with the KJV:

      Dean John Burgon was a contemporary of Hort and an Oxford scholar
      who utterly rejected what textual critics had been doing for 200
      years prior to him and culminated in the Westcott-Hort text of 1881
      in the scholarly rejection of the medieval majority text as the most
      sound witness to the New Testament autographica. He is the locus
      classicus for all modern dissent from textual criticism, although in
      general he is much better than his latter day epigones in offering a
      serious scholarly re-think of the tenor and direction that textual
      criticism has taken in the last 300 years.

      Dean Burgon wrote a famous critique of Westcott and Hort's textual
      theory, and the Revised King James Bible they helped to edit, and is
      available special order:

      Whether Hort or Burgon embraced tractarianism seems clearly to be
      false, and in any event irrelevant to the textual criticism
      controversy between them, but since Keith (a Burgon champion) was
      charging that Hort was a Newman-clone without Newman's courage and
      that the eclectic text (called also the critical text, because it is
      edited according to the principles of textual criticism) was a tool
      of Romanism to destroy Protestantism, Paul, Keith and myself have
      been discussing of late just how Anglican Dr Hort on the one hand
      and Dean Burgon on the other really were.


      Montreal, QC
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.