- May 15, 2003Surfing the web Wedesday, I could hardly believe it. I stumbled
across The Answer.
The insight is amazing. Sheer brilliance. I can't believe I hadn't
figured it out on my own.
Though I'm not quite yet ready to part with the "there must be
Something WrongTM with me" solution, the calculations are both
startling and irrefutable. The results may be slightly affected
depending on a slight adjustment in age requirements (18-25 at 2000
roughly calculates to 21-28 at 2003, so keeping the same basic age
range and perhaps dropping a couple years at the bottom end and
adding a couple years potential at the top end would place more
stress in the lower population group represented in the demographic
information, so there may perhaps be a slight drop in the final
number in the calculations thereby - on the other hand, keeping those
bottom two years at the bottom and adding two on the top will
slightly increase the numbers). Adding the requirement that they be
Christian, the field narrows considerably (especially once we narrow
it to either reformed or that vague "open to learning" category).
So there you have it. Scientific, statistical, accurate.
- charlie brown
- Next post in topic >>