16839Re: [Covenanted Reformation] Re: the Covenanted Reformation
- Dec 10 3:14 PMKevin Guillory wrote:
>The reason I said that one has no business posting to the question if
> I just joined this group and really liked what you had to say. But
> almost left after I saw his response to you. I still may, but will
> wait and see.
they don't know the basics of the covenantal status of England, GB, the
colonies et.al. is that this is a critical point to start with to
determine who is an oath-breaker and who is not. To accuse American
churches of breaking these vows if they were never legally or ethically
subordinate to them is a serious violation of the ninth commandment.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>