16414Re: [Covenanted Reformation] The E-Mail from Holland
- Apr 3, 2008--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, Jerry
>That's always a safe response, Jerry!
> i don't know what this about.
I know nothing.
>it (I suppose to show the content that Bob deleted from his blog?)?
> Ic Neltococayotl wrote:
> > I take it everyone here got that e-mail from Holland from Dennis?
> > So, Dennis, what is the point? I am just wonderng why we all got
> >blog...actually did not even know there was a place to post on Bob's
> > I personally was unaware of that discussion on that
> >Better check the battery and warranty for that decoder ring, Edgar.
> > Edgar
Seriously as regards the Dutch email, to a boy with a hammer,
everything is a nail. Because I do not agree with or understand Mr.
Grutzmacher 100%, I am a papist or a promoter thereof.
For instance, some of those excommunicated by the RPNA(GM) have joined
churches, such as the OPC, URC, RPCNA etc. which deny the consensus
view of the Reformation that the Pope is the Antichrist.
Yet to my reply that it does not follow that to deny the extraordinary
telephone session of the RPNA(GM) is to necessarily deny the
Reformation witness against the papacy, Dennis descends further IMO
into menacing and incoherent bile.
In other words, when someone is given an opportunity/is requested to
explain their comments and they vehemently refuse to do so, I avail
myself of the little garbage can icon for their comments. And someone
doesn't like that.
Of course in all this, Mr. Grutzmacher or others even, may think my
comments too flippant. If so, I respectfully refer them to Prov. 14:13:
Even in laughter the heart is sorrowful; and the end of that mirth is
cordially in Christ,
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>