Re: [cosmacelf] Doc Files 2
- cdp1861 wrote:
> Ooops -what did I do? ... I'm putting together a little developmentNothing wrong. Your project sounds great! The way you are approaching it
> system for the Elf. I'm thinking of integrating an essembler, chip8
> programming, and the management of the projects into my Elf Tools.
> To round things off, there also should be all kinds of Elf related
> documentation so you can do some programming without having to look
> up everything seperately.
seems a bit odd, but then anyone working with the 1802 is by definition
a bit odd :-)
> That's why I need the files in rich text format...If you are doing this project for your own enjoyment, then by all means
you should use whatever you like. It only has to work on your computer.
But if you are doing it for other's benefit, then you need to take into
account what others are using. They probably have different versions of
Windows than you do, or are running Linux, or a Mac.
My own experience with Microsoft products has been poor. They seem to
change file formats every few years, so older versions of their products
can't read the files produced by newer versions. You may find that your
development package is trapped on a particular version of Windows.
For text files, it appears that basic HTML has achieved a sort of
cross-platform standardization (as long as you avoid using the
enhancements promoted by Microsoft, Netscape, etc.). You might want to
consider this format for your documentation. Almost anyone can provide
source documents to you in this format (since it can be produced by any
text editor). Failing that, *everyone* can produce plain old ASCII
files. You can even get your submissions by cutting and pasting from
emails already on the cosmacelf website and archives. Most 1802
literature isn't going to have any graphs or pictures, anyway.
For your programs themselves, I would suggest that you not get too
carried away with a flashy interface. I'm a design engineer, and use
various microcontrollers in my work. The development system software
often looks beautiful in the demos, and works horribly in actual
applications. It's slow, or crashes, or fails to properly emulate the
target processor, or falsely reports problems that aren't there, or
creates problems on its own. All too often, I have to find a version
that is the least buggy, and stick with it regardless of further
manufacturer "updates". In some cases, it's the oldest DOS version!
Lee A. Hart Ring the bells that still can ring
814 8th Ave. N. Forget your perfect offering
Sartell, MN 56377 USA There is a crack in everything
leeahart_at_earthlink.net That's how the light gets in - Leonard Cohen