7879Re: [cosmacelf] Re: Did I miss something
- Aug 2 8:58 AMOn 7/29/2011 3:04 PM, the-eagle@... wrote:
> I have been fooled for all these years, back in 1977/78 when I put myYou could still be correct. There have been thousands of spacecraft.
> COSMAC ELF together, I thought I was assembling a computer that was
> used in the early spaceflight program.
It's not easy to ferret out what NASA used. Many military aerospace
projects are classified, so we have no idea what they used. The 1802 was
a logical choice.
The web is helpful, but is not a very reliable source of data. You can
find correct answers, but also every permutation of wrong answers to
most questions. :-)
One little nugget I can add: Ham radio operators have been building and
deploying their own amateur satellites since 1972. They formed AMSAT
(AMateur SATellite Corp), which has built a long line of OSCAR
satellites, getting them into orbit by "hitchhiking" a ride on various
government and commercial launches (the ham satellites are used as
ballast or filler in some other mission).
Anyway, the Jan 1979 issue of Byte Magazine had an article "IPS: An
Unorthodox High Level Language" by Dr. Karl Meinzer. It described a
version of FORTH that was used on the 1802 in the ham's OSCAR
satellites. I haven't found dates for all the OSCAR launches, but AMSAT
OSCAR-10, launched in 6/16/1983, definitely had an 1802 on board. This
definitely precedes Galileo's launch in 1989.
Lee A. Hart | Ring the bells that still can ring
814 8th Ave N | Forget the perfect offering
Sartell MN 56377 | There is a crack in everything
leeahart earthlink.net | That's how the light gets in -- Leonard Cohen
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>