Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

7056Re: [cosmacelf] Re: FPGA-Elf

Expand Messages
  • J.C. Wren
    Aug 1, 2010
      I always release my source under a personal "Do whatever the hell you like
      with it" license. I find all this Copyleft, GPL up, Berkely down, Creative
      Commons charmed, BSD strange stuff confusing as all get-out. Once I write
      it, I really don't care what anyone does with it. If they make a mint, and
      even if I had put some license on it, I still don't have the money to
      enforce it, and I sure can't look at every product that comes out to see if
      they incorporated any of my code.

      So, no, I have no opinion on that one. :)


      If at first you don't succeed, call in an airstrike.

      On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 2:33 AM, jdripper <eric@...> wrote:

      > "J.C. Wren" <jcwren@...> wrote:
      > > I know of only one other that exists, and the guy wasn't interested
      > > in releasing it because he had commercial customers for it.
      > >
      > > What are your plans for the core? Is it fully qualified, and does
      > > DMA work?
      > I'd love to have commercial customers for my core. On the other hand, I'd
      > also like to make it available for hobbyists to use. I haven't figured out
      > what license to use. Maybe the GPL. Any opinions?
      > I haven't yet tested:
      > * DMA (though it mostly uses the same logic as "load mode", so I expect it
      > will work)
      > * Interrupts
      > * The RET, DIS, SDB, SAV, and MARK instructions

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • Show all 6 messages in this topic