494Re: [cooking_rumpolt] OT: 16th c. German, not Rumpolt
- Mar 9 9:49 AMGwen Cat wrote:
>I disagree with your interpretation of gericht. Yes, Gericht isIt is from a long section where Dernschwam talks about food and various dishes.
>court of law, and gericht is associated with right/correctness, BUT
>in this case 'ein gericht' is 'a dish' as in prepared food. I do
>not think the definition has changed from then to modern.
>As for who the ihnen refers to I would lean toward a particular
>people. not having seen how this fits in context I hesitate to
>guess, but if it is part of a travel report then perhaps the ihnen
>are his hosts????
I gave the link to the text in my first message on Thomas Gloning's site:
Urtatim [that's err-tah-TEEM]
the persona formerly known as Anahita
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>