Re: FW: Continuing Comments- RD1 Removal
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Barbara Meyer" <bfmeyer@...>
> Ok here I am again. In this paragraph you say that you expected a10% loss in membership over the dues increase.
1.What is the increase?
2.Is it over 10%?
3.Is it going to cover the losses?
4. What is going to be in the future?
I have this whole Ross Perot theary going on all of the new actions
taking place. Do any of you remember the big sucking sound theary?
Little ole Ross was right about the federal government and I can
here the wind starting here as well.
In other words I fear this is going to kill the AKA. And that is a
shame I have injoyed the friendships I have made on a national
basis in the AKA. ANd like many others here I have no way of
affording ot travel to visit friends so I rely on festivals
sponsered by the AKA to visit and injoy there company.
Ok done venting again.
Fly the Jolly Rodger High; Dave.
> A final comment!! If the board does remove Woody, how manymembers are going to be offended by the action? Have you considered
this factor in your decision to remove him? The board was
anticipating maximum 10 percent loss due to the price increase.
But, what about the negative effect of canning Woody? It might be
just the reason for others to consider leaving the fold. Sympathy
always goes out to the underdog, regardless of principles involved.
And, might I add, Woody is a pretty popular underdog, at that. Are
you willing to take that risk over a flimsy case in point?
> We donât know how many will leave. My personal hope is that wecan find a way out of this. The board has to be able to do the work
of the AKA without getting side tracked by someone âpushing
buttonsâ Yea, itâs a lot of fun to get a reaction. Do we take up
time responding to that, or do we try to focus on improving the
> Â Barbara Meyer