Re: Loglan[g] VS Natlang
- 2013/1/18 MorphemeAddict <lytlesw@...>:
>On Brazilian streets, although "americano" is usually synonym of "born
> One of the meanings (the primary one, now, I'd say) is that America is just
> the USA. It's one part of the Americas, but USA and America are synonyms to
> most people.
in the USA", "América" is rarely "the USA" except for those who are
clearly mimicking foreigners. The USA is simply "Estados Unidos", and
very rarely "Estados Unidos da América" (I guess many non-educated
because don't even know that there's the part "da América" in "Estados
2013/1/22 Chris Peters <beta_leonis@...>:
>Other claims I have heard:
>> From: mathieu.roy.37@...
>> I've heard people saying that since Chinese had shorter words for numbers,
>> they could count faster. I've also heard people saying Chinese were better
>> musicians in general because it was a tonal language IIRC. IDK if either of
>> these claims are accurate.
> I've heard something related to the music statement: that native speakers of tonal languages are more likely to have perfect pitch.
(a) English speakers are more intelligent than many others because the
ortography of English is more irregular, so an English speaker will
have trained more their* brain by the age they become literate.
* singular their.
(b) Japanese people are more intelligent because they have to deal
with too many writing systems (including hundreds of Chinese
characters as some other people also learn).
(c) People whose number names are more analytical are better at maths.
So, someone who speak a language where 11 is read as "ten-one" would
be better than someone whose language have an irregular name for 11.
As six in Wolof is "five-one" and sixteen is "ten-five-one", they
should be the best mathematicians. In fact, I have known a very
intelligent Wolof-speaker Physicist, but I doubt this is a rule.
- 2013/1/24 Adam Walker <carraxan@...>:
> I once knew a Russian guy named Vladik. He was a music major, anSinging is a more controlled situation than normal conversation.
> excellent pianist. He cloud put on the most convincing New York
> accent, sounded like he was born in the Bronx! But when he was just
> speaking, he had the "typical" Russian accent with odd vowels and
> unneeded palatalizations and overly aspirated consonants. I never
> quite understood that.
Singers knows the words they'll sing previously, so they can have a
better control over their accents. It's also interesting that many
stutterers don't stutter while singing.
Singers usually mimic characters and other singers' voices and nuances
very well, but this ability is not always the same in normal speech. I
could imitate Louis Armstrong singing "What I wonderful world" but I
could not imitate his voice while discussing Quantum Physics in