Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: WHAT calendar for the current year 2012

Expand Messages
  • Philip Newton
    ... I presume you mean Το «Μάττερχορν» όρο το εν Ελβετίο without the second Matterhorn ? Are category-name pairs always in the
    Message 1 of 33 , Jan 31, 2008
      2008/1/31 R A Brown <ray@...>:
      > Cf. Το όρο «Μάττερχορν» εν το Ελβετίο. Φωτογραφίο εκ το Άνδρου Βόσσι.
      > 'Matterhorn' names the mountain and I think should come between the
      > article and the noun; therefore, I would write the first part thus:
      > Το «Μάττερχορν» όρο «Μάττερχορν» το εν Ελβετίο.

      I presume you mean Το «Μάττερχορν» όρο το εν Ελβετίο without the
      second "Matterhorn"?

      Are category-name pairs always in the order article-name-category,
      then? "Mount Foo" is the only example that comes to mind immediately,
      but what about, hmm, Lake Powell? "Το Παύελ λίμνο"? (Hm, what about
      capitalisation - is it "lake Powell" or "Lake Powell"?) "Το Ναιάγρα

      > 1. Το όρο «Μάττερχορν» εν το Ελβετίο. Φωτογραφίο εκ το Άνδρου Βόσσι.
      > Most of this has already been commented upon; as for the names, I see no
      > reason why the Germanic name 'Matterhorn' should not exist in WHAT and
      > the TAKE spelling is fine.
      > Possibly Josephos Peanou (JP) would have derived the TAKE form of Andrew
      > from Greek (because that's where name comes from), in which case we'd
      > have Ανδρέο

      What's the TAKE policy on "nativising" names?

      My guess was that no alteration is made and that names are simply
      transcribed as well as possible -- much as, for example, we write
      Eduard Shevardnadze and Mikhail Gorbachev, not Edward and Michael. And
      Mr Bossi, living in Anglophonia (possible the Enou Basileio, possibly
      the Enou Politeio or elsewhere) as he does and speaking Anglish, would
      presumably have been christened Androu and not Andreas.

      I suppose things might be different for TAKEists in WHAT who might
      consciously adopt a TAKEised form of their name for use when speaking
      that language (much as, say, an Esperantist *here* might adopt an
      Esperantised form of his name for use within the community), but for
      Joe Average -- who might not even speak TAKE -- it would seem odd to
      me to TAKEise the name.

      On the other hand, it's possible that TAKE speakers tend to me more
      "aggressive" at nativising names (if an obvious equivalent can be
      found) than English speakers. (Even English speakers do this with some
      names, e.g. Benjamin Netanyahu rather than Binyamin.) If so, though, I
      wonder whether this applies only to cognate names or whether they'd
      also translate names, thus making e.g. a Πήτερ Μύλλερ from Germania
      into a Πέτρο Μυλώνο (as opposed to the
      nativise-cognates-but-don't-translate form Πέτρο Μύλλερ or the plain
      transcribed form, which isn't necessary in this case since Germania
      uses the Greek alphabet already, but which might be an option e.g. for
      someone from India).

      Perhaps you could ask JP for clarification on his policy on rendering
      names of non-TAKE-speakers.

      > 2, Το πύργο «Αίφελ» εν το Παρί εν το Γαλλίο. Φωτογραφίο εκ το Κριστίν
      > Σέλεκ Τρεμουλή.
      > I'm sure Παρί is not the correct form - remember, there'd have been no
      > French in WHAT!

      D'oh! Yes, I fell into that trap a couple of times.

      > I note in Modern Greek it is Παρίσι which I assume is a demotic form of
      > Katharevousa Παρίσιον. Therefore - assuming that a city with a similar
      > name to Paris existed in the Gaul of WHAT (and that some guy called
      > /ajfEl/ built such a structure there) - the TAKE form will be Παρίσιο.

      I also wondered whether it might be Λουτέτιο, from the Latin name
      Lutetia (the things reading Asterix teachers you...).

      > 3. Το πύλο εκ το Βράνδενβουργ εν το Βερλίν εν το Γερμανίο. Φωτογραφίο εκ
      > το Ματίας Ζίγμουνδ.
      > Το εκ Βράνδενβουργ πύλο or perhaps have an adjective derived from
      > Brandenburg, e.g. Το Βρανδενβουργικό πύλο
      > (Assuming there is a Brandenburg Gate in WHAT :-)
      > Assuming that there was a Berlin in WHAT and that it was the capital of
      > Germany, I feel sure JP would think the city worthy of having a
      > Hellinized form of its name,i.e. Βερλίνο

      Modern Greek is Beroλίνο, so perhaps I'd take that one. (And Latin is
      apparently Berolinum, at least according to Wikipedia, which would be
      another point in favour of the medial -o-.)

      > 5. Το μικρό ναιάδο εν το Κοβενχάμν εν το Δανίο. Φωτογραφιο εκ το Άλπερ
      > Τσούγουν
      > Yes, ναϊάδο should, as you observed in another email, have the diaeresis
      > if it's properly derived from ancient Greek, i.e. it is tetrasyllabic
      > /na.i.'a.da/ rather than trisyllabic /naj'ja.da/. I'm certain JP
      > would've insisted on it :)

      Ah; thanks.

      > The μν at the end of Κοβενχάμν seems to me unlikely to have been
      > retained in TAKE. In any case, I thought the Danish was København.

      Quite so -- I had mixed it up with Swedish "Köpenhamn" again.

      > 7. Το ναό «Το Άγιο Οικογένειο» εν το Βαρκελώνα εν το Ισπανίο. Φωτογραφιο
      > εκ το Χ. Σαλμοράλ
      > Βαρκελώνα looks a 'spelling loan' so to speak.

      Yes. I was influenced, no doubt, by Modern Greek Βαρκελώνη. But yes, a
      pronunciation respelling is clearly superior, especially since Ispania
      uses the Greek alphabet anyway.

      > But on checking I find that the ancient name of the place
      > as given by Roman authors was _Barcino_ (gen. Barcinonis) and in Greek
      > authors as Βαρκινών (gen. βαρκινῶνος) in Greek. Knowing JP's fondness
      > for using the ancient forms as the basis for TAKE, I fee sure he would
      > give the name as Βαρκινώνο.
      > (The modern Catalonian/Spanish name shows the normal change of Latin
      > short /i/ to /e/. I assume the -lon- is dissimilation to avoid repeated
      > /n/ in -non-)

      That makes much sense. So, the city's name is essentially "Barcinona"
      [would that be the accusative in Latin?] + sound change?

      > 9. Το Γέφυρο εκ το Πύργο εν το Λόνδον εν το Ένου Βασίλειο. Φωτογραφιο εκ
      > το To have Υ. Χ. Λαν.
      > Tut, tut - Βασίλειο would come from βασίλεια (final short -a) "queen."
      > 'Kingdom' was βασιλεία (final long -a).

      Modern Greek misled me here -- it's βασίλειο. Well, according to my
      dictionary, "Königreich" can be either βασίλειο or βασιλείο, but the
      UK, for example, is Το Ηνωμένο Βασίλειο.

      Should have checked my Ancient Greek dictionary.

      > 10. Το βασίλειο εν το Φαδούτς εν το Λίχτενσταιν. Φωτογραφίο εκ το Μίχαηλ
      > Βηάτ
      > Doesn't look much like a queen to me :)

      I went by my AG dictionary, which gave τα βασίλεια for "Schloss" (and
      has "Palast, Hof" as some meanings of the substantivised adjective το

      > But 'castle' - we can't borrow from Latin _castellum_ as there's no
      > Latin in WHAT! However, the ancient word φρούριον will do nicely for
      > Schloss or 'castle'; and this will be φρούριο in TAKE.

      This is probably better in order to avoid the homophony, even if το
      βασίλειον/τα βασίλεια were licit.

      > Presumably Βηάτ /be'at/ is his surname (How's it spelled?)

      Exactly the way you did :) His name is "Michael Beat", which I first
      took for Μαίκλ Βίτ, but who is apparently Swiss so I presumed a
      pronunciation of Μίχαελ Βηάτ.

      "Beat" is a typically Swiss-German male given name (though the
      feminine form "Beate" is also used in Germany), though I suppose in
      WHAT the name would not exist, since as far as I can tell, it's from
      Latin "beatus". I imagine the photographer's WHATish _alter ego_ might
      carry the family name Μακάρ or something like that instead, from the
      common Elvetic male given name of the same form.

      I think I shan't make that change in my calendar, though -- I'll treat
      it as the name of someone from a parallel dimension, where a language
      spoken in a backwards part of Italia took over western Europe and gave
      its roots to some people's names. (Plus that'll make it easier to
      comply with the Attribution clause of the Creative Commons licences of
      the images than if I start "sanitising" names with Romance elements
      that "shouldn't" exist, in which case I would presumably also have to
      add the "standard" version of the name anyway.)

      > I hope these observations have been helpful.

      Indeed; thank you!

      Though I'd appreciate a clarification on the transcription-vs-adaption
      policy for foreign proper names.

      > But the Calendar is a fine piece of work :)

      Thank you kindly!

      Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>
    • Andreas Johansson
      ... Apparently I should not try and post Greek letters. That s Katerina and Aikaterin� respectively. Andreas
      Message 33 of 33 , Feb 2, 2008
        Quoting Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>:

        > Quoting Philip Newton <philip.newton@...>:
        > > 2008/2/1 R A Brown <ray@...>:
        > > > I suspect that baptisms in Greece will use the Koine forms of names and
        > > > not the modern. E.g. Γιάννης will have been baptized as
        > > Ἰωάννης.
        > >
        > > Quite so. (Though without the breathing, if he was baptised after
        > > 1982.) I think that his identity papers will also show Ιωάννης.
        > > Similarly with Γιώργος / Γεώργιος, etc., and I think that
        > > Κατερίνα
        > > will have been baptised Αικατερίνη as well.
        > A Greek friend of mine is called
        > Κατερίνα, but her passport indeed
        > says
        > Αικατερίνη.

        Apparently I should not try and post Greek letters. That's "Katerina" and
        "Aikaterinê" respectively.

      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.