16090Re: 29P and C/2009 U6
- Nov 1, 2009Hi all.
The morning Francois Kugel posted the photo of 81P/29P, I also saw the star trail to the right of 29P and dismissed it as an asteroid with a coincidental cluster of brighter "pixels" off to its right.
So, is it correct that if ANY OF US had brought the object to the attention of "Comets Mailing List" / CBAT as being comet-like just before LINEAR, the object would have been named C/2009 U6 Kugel?
I had tried to spot 81P last week with a 14" SCT, but its surface brightness was too low to see in the light polluted skies of western New Jersey. Once the moon leaves the morning sky, I should be able to pick it up, making it my 158th comet and 182th comet apparition.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Mr Wyatt" <carlec@...> wrote:
> Thanks for your insight guys!
> It's a shame that there's so much conjecture regarding naming of comets
> discovered through media other than the discoverers own.
> I think all of us here would like to have a comet named after us, even
> though many already do, and it's just reward for the many hours of patience
> and perseverance.
> It's part of the reason why we all do it i guess!
> In the meantime i'll just keep looking and observing and perhaps someday
> i'll find something!
> I hope to get to 81P soon, as it will be my 50th observed comet, should i
> find it ;-)
> I can only imagine how alan must feel who isn't too far away from his 500th!
> I hope one day i can reach that far......
> Chris Wyatt
> Walcha, NSW
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>