Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [cp] Knowledge sharing in fire departments

Expand Messages
  • douglas.rush@aventis.com
    I don t think it matters whether it s F2F or virtual - getting people to interact, around problem solving for example, can occur in both. We use
    Message 1 of 9 , Dec 3, 2001
      I don't think it matters whether it's F2F or virtual - getting people
      to interact, around problem solving for example, can occur in both.
      We use teleconferences in a CoP with members in Europe and NA - this
      virtual community is starting to show some benefit as a result of
      knowledge sharing. One other point - it's not just about sharing what
      you know. It's important for people to seek help - to share what they
      don't know or are having problems/issues with.

      As to the survey - it's been put on hold till January - can revisit


      --- In com-prac@y..., "chris macrae" <wcbn007@e...> wrote:
      > yes, BUT is this one of the main differences between knowledge
      sharing face
      > to face and knowledge-sharing virtually? or can you give me an
      example how
      > the knowledge emerges in virtual mode (except of course with things
      that are
      > directly software etc related)
      > going back to your KM survey Douglas - is an interview sequence
      > developed for both real and virtual modes?
      > chris macrae
      > wcbn007@e...
      > ----- Original Message -----
      > From: <douglas.rush@a...>
      > To: <com-prac@y...>
      > Sent: 30 November 2001 14:33 PM
      > Subject: Re: [cp] Knowledge sharing in fire departments
      > > Sorry to diverge from the firehouse thread but Bill's comments on
      > > knowledge sharing really resonate with me. As part of a KM group
      > > within R&D at a large pharma company, we're trying to build and
      > > enhance CoP's to encourage knowledge sharing. I think we have
      > > sometimes put K sharing too much in the center - Bill's comments
      > > it should be an emergent property, a by-product if you will, of
      > > efforts to facilitate interaction and collaboration among the R&D
      > > scientists is right on.
      > >
      > > Doug
      > >
      > > --- In com-prac@y..., "Bill Fleming" <info@s...> wrote:
      > > Diane mentioned sharing knowledge and allowing newcomers to
      > > participate in life and death situations such as hospitals. I
      > > this is an important issue. But I wonder how we construe 'sharing
      > > knowledge' and its relationship to participation. Are we
      thinking of
      > > sharing knowledge in practice settings where such sharing is an
      > > aspect of participation? If so, books like Paul
      Atkinson's 'Medical
      > > Talk and Medical Work', Seth Chaiklin with Jean
      > > Lave's 'Understanding Practice' and Yrjo Engestrom with David
      > > Middleton's 'Cognition and Communication at Work' provide some
      > > insights into how knowledge is produced, reproduced and shared
      > > through participation in a variety of work settings, not all of
      > > deal with life and death. In much of this work the focus is on
      > > getting the job done rather than sharing knowledge, but the job
      > > be done without sharing knowledge. The sharing is a constituent
      > > of getting the job done, but does not necessarily need to be the
      > > centre of attention. How much attention should we give to sharing
      > > knowledge where the CoP enterprise is centred on some other set of
      > > principles and objectives? A central part of the thinking about
      > > and legitimate peripheral participation is to decentre learning,
      > > including sharing knowledge, i.e. to shift the focus from
      learning as
      > > the enterprise to learning as an emergent aspect of participation.
      > > Bill
      > >
      > > Bill Fleming and Lesley Golding,
      > > Soundings Research, 41 Cotton's Meadow, Kingstone, Herefordshire
      > > 9EW, UK
      > > Tel/Fax: 01981 250033
      > > Email: mail@s...
      > >
      > >
      > > ::: http://www.egroups.com/group/com-prac
      > > ::: Email com-prac-unsubscribe@egroups.com to unsubscribe
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
      > >
      > >
      > >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.