8099RE: [cp] Forums & KM: What CoP's Should Do to Manage Discussion-Produced Knowledge
- Jan 28, 2009Great discussion
Maybe it is useful to separate the value of archives and the
community's sense of attachment to/owner ship of the archives -- even
if they are never used.
I suspect that only a small percentage of the members (over time)
would actually use the archives. But because they hold the words of
members, there may be both individual and collective sense of
ownership that have little to do with "utility."
How would they feel if there had simply been a technical catastrophe
and the archives disappeared? Would the quality and quantity of the
response be similar or different? Is it that someone (the current
list owners) took the decision and they had no say in it?
I don't think we can underestimate the role of emotions as well as
intellect in communities. ;-)
That said, think of all the electronic garbage floating around and
that one of the biggest barriers to knowledge sharing is the
complaint that "i don't have enough time and there is too much out
there and not all of it has value to me."
Damned if you do, damned if you dont!
At 10:37 AM 1/28/2009, you wrote:
>Bottom line: it's a BAD idea to throw away archives.Nancy White | Full Circle Associates | Connecting communities online
>ON THE OTHER HAND: CPsquare discussions have been kept for years and years
>and so when new poeple join I shake my head and worry that they'll
>absolutely CHOKE at the volume and complexity. Just don't know.
nancyw@... | +1 206 517 4754 | GMT - 8 |skype - choconancy |
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>