Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [coldwarcomms] Eastern Shore Microwave sites (more)

Expand Messages
  • David Lesher
    ... Wow. Virtually any other acquisition issue can be avoided by just buying [here ATT] the corp. and leaving it in place running... Learn something every day.
    Message 1 of 8 , Jul 5, 2005
    • 0 Attachment
      Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:

      > This application (amongst a group of others) is a formality required
      > by the impending acquisition of AT&T by SBC. Whenever a controlling
      > interest in an FCC licensee is going to change, the licensee must
      > apply to the Commission for permission to transfer control of the
      > license.

      Wow. Virtually any other acquisition issue can be avoided by just
      buying [here ATT] the corp. and leaving it in place running...

      Learn something every day.




      --
      A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@...
      & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
      Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
      is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
    • James Browne
      But why would the FCC do the exact opposite in regards to comm facilities? ... -- Jim Browne
      Message 2 of 8 , Jul 5, 2005
      • 0 Attachment
        But why would the FCC do the exact opposite in regards to comm facilities?

        On 7/5/05, David Lesher <wb8foz@...> wrote:
        > Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
        >
        > > This application (amongst a group of others) is a formality required
        > > by the impending acquisition of AT&T by SBC. Whenever a controlling
        > > interest in an FCC licensee is going to change, the licensee must
        > > apply to the Commission for permission to transfer control of the
        > > license.
        >
        > Wow. Virtually any other acquisition issue can be avoided by just
        > buying [here ATT] the corp. and leaving it in place running...
        >
        > Learn something every day.
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > --
        > A host is a host from coast to
        > coast.................wb8foz@...
        > & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
        > Unless the host (that isn't
        > close).........................pob 1433
        > is busy, hung or
        > dead....................................20915-1433
        >
        >
        > SPONSORED LINKS
        > Cold war Military Politics
        > ________________________________
        > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
        >
        >
        > Visit your group "coldwarcomms" on the web.
        >
        > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
        > coldwarcomms-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
        >
        > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
        > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
        > coldwarcomms-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
        >
        > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
        > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
        > ________________________________
        >


        --
        Jim Browne
      • Paul Zawada
        The FCC doesn t want someone quitely buying companies to acquire licenses in an undetectable manner. They want to know who ultimately has control of a
        Message 3 of 8 , Jul 6, 2005
        • 0 Attachment
          The FCC doesn't want someone quitely buying companies to acquire
          licenses in an undetectable manner. They want to know who ultimately
          has control of a license.

          --zawada


          On 7/5/05, James Browne <jamesm.browne@...> wrote:
          > But why would the FCC do the exact opposite in regards to comm facilities?
          >
          > On 7/5/05, David Lesher <wb8foz@...> wrote:
          > > Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
          > >
          > > > This application (amongst a group of others) is a formality required
          > > > by the impending acquisition of AT&T by SBC. Whenever a controlling
          > > > interest in an FCC licensee is going to change, the licensee must
          > > > apply to the Commission for permission to transfer control of the
          > > > license.
          > >
          > > Wow. Virtually any other acquisition issue can be avoided by just
          > > buying [here ATT] the corp. and leaving it in place running...
          > >
        • James Browne
          That would make sense. Comm facilities are of far more concern than a donut shop. ... -- Jim Browne
          Message 4 of 8 , Jul 6, 2005
          • 0 Attachment
            That would make sense. Comm facilities are of far more concern than a
            donut shop.

            On 7/6/05, Paul Zawada <EngineerZ@...> wrote:
            > The FCC doesn't want someone quitely buying companies to acquire
            > licenses in an undetectable manner. They want to know who ultimately
            > has control of a license.
            >
            > --zawada
            >
            >
            > On 7/5/05, James Browne <jamesm.browne@...> wrote:
            > > But why would the FCC do the exact opposite in regards to comm facilities?
            > >
            > > On 7/5/05, David Lesher <wb8foz@...> wrote:
            > > > Speaking on Deep Background, the Press Secretary whispered:
            > > >
            > > > > This application (amongst a group of others) is a formality required
            > > > > by the impending acquisition of AT&T by SBC. Whenever a controlling
            > > > > interest in an FCC licensee is going to change, the licensee must
            > > > > apply to the Commission for permission to transfer control of the
            > > > > license.
            > > >
            > > > Wow. Virtually any other acquisition issue can be avoided by just
            > > > buying [here ATT] the corp. and leaving it in place running...
            > > >
            >
            > ________________________________
            > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
            >
            > Visit your group "coldwarcomms" on the web.
            >
            > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
            > coldwarcomms-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
            >
            > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
            > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
            > coldwarcomms-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
            >
            > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
            > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
            > ________________________________
            >


            --
            Jim Browne
          Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.