Re: [coldwarcomms] Hardened UHF antennas (Possible)
As has already been pointed out, the hardened antennas at the missile sites
are different from those at Fairview and Williamstown.
As for the antennas at Williamstown, I do not believe that there is a
"tunnel" between the building and the antennas, only a conduit for cables.
Also, be aware that there are/were two identical hardened antennas at the
site. The one in the field on the ridge may be gone (I think it was on the
neighbor's property, maybe on an easement/ROW) but the one on in the woods
behind the facility is almost certainly still there.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Thomas Maulding <tmaulding@...>wrote:
> I am redirecting this message back to you ("Tim") of this group requesting
> a possible confirmation of what he is referring to "Pj" as a hardened UHF
> antenna.(no pictures were provided)
> Some years ago at an AT&T site in Williamstown Ky, I photographed what I
> believed was an unusual antenna mounted on an approx. 20-25 ft tall tapered
> concrete pillar which was the 2nd of 2 similar sites at that location (see
> attached B&W photos-sorry about the quality). Are these what you are
> referring to??(as hardened UHF antennas).
> A recent return to that site found that the MW tower is still standing (as
> are the E/F antenna and the GEP antennas on top of the MW tower) but the
> concrete pillars and attached antennas have been removed clear to the
> ground. Missing also were what I believed to be an underground concrete
> tunnel access from the former pillar(s) back to the AT&T bldg that provided
> access to the main bldg and/or tower site.
> Could anyone confirm that these are what "Tim" referred to as hardened UHF
> antenna sites( which obviously are no longer in use)??
> If so, who made the antennas & can anyone provide me with more details of
> their past use and if there are any other web sites that would provide me
> with more details?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]