Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Fw: The INF Treaty and the Washington Summit: 20 Years Later

Expand Messages
  • Albert LaFrance
    ... From: National Security Archive To: Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 7:50 PM Subject: The INF Treaty and the
    Message 1 of 1 , Dec 10, 2007
    • 0 Attachment
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "National Security Archive" <archive@...>
      To: <NSARCHIVE@...>
      Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 7:50 PM
      Subject: The INF Treaty and the Washington Summit: 20 Years Later


      > National Security Archive Update, December 10, 2007
      >
      > The INF Treaty and the Washington Summit: 20 Years Later
      >
      > http://www.nsarchive.org
      >
      > Washington D.C., December 10, 2007 - Previously secret Soviet Politburo records and declassified
      American transcripts of the Washington summit 20 years ago between President Ronald Reagan and
      Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev show that Gorbachev was willing to go much further than
      the Americans expected or were able to reciprocate on arms cuts and resolving regional conflicts,
      according to documents posted today by the National Security Archive at George Washington University
      (www.nsarchive.org).
      >
      > Today's posting includes the internal Soviet deliberations leading up to the summit, full
      transcripts of the two leaders' discussions, the Soviet record of negotiations with top American
      diplomats, and other historic records being published for the first time.
      >
      > The documents show that the Soviet Union made significant changes to its initial position to
      accommodate the U.S. demands, beginning with "untying the package" of strategic arms, missile
      defense, and INF in February 1987 and then agreeing to eliminate its newly deployed OKA/SS-23
      missiles, while pressing the U.S. leadership to agree on substantial reductions of strategic nuclear
      weapons. Gorbachev's goal was to prepare and sign the START Treaty on the basis of 50 percent
      reductions of strategic offensive weapons in 1988 before the Reagan administration left office. In
      the course of negotiations, the Soviet Union also proposed cutting conventional forces in Europe by
      25 percent and starting negotiations to eliminate chemical weapons.
      >
      > The documents also detail Gorbachev's desire for genuine collaboration with the U.S. in resolving
      regional conflicts, especially the Iran-Iraq War, Afghanistan, the Middle East, and Nicaragua.
      However, the documents show that the U.S. side was unwilling and unable to pursue many of the Soviet
      initiatives at the time due to political struggles within the Reagan administration. Reading these
      documents one gets a visceral sense of missed opportunities for achieving even deeper cuts in
      nuclear arsenals, resolving regional conflicts, and ending the Cold War even earlier.
      >
      > The documents paint the fullest declassified portrait yet available of the Washington summit which
      ended 20 years ago today and centered on the signing of the Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF)
      Treaty--the only treaty of its kind in actually eliminating an entire class of nuclear weapons. By
      eliminating mainly the missiles based in Europe, the treaty lowered the threat of nuclear war in
      Europe substantially and cleared the way for negotiations on tactical nuclear and chemical weapons,
      as well as negotiations on conventional forces in Europe.
      >
      > Under the Treaty, the Soviet Union destroyed 889 of its intermediate-range missiles and 957
      shorter-range missiles, and the U.S. destroyed 677 and 169 respectively. These were the missiles
      with very short flight time to targets in the Soviet Union, which made them "most likely to spur
      escalation to general nuclear war from any local hostilities that might erupt." These weapons were
      perceived as most threatening by the Soviet leadership, which is why the Soviet military supported
      the Treaty, even though there was a significant opposition among them to including the shorter-range
      weapons.
      >
      > The Treaty included remarkably extensive and intrusive verification inspection and monitoring
      arrangements, based on the "any time and place" proposal of March 1987, which was accepted by the
      Soviets to the Americans' surprise; and the documents show that the Soviets were willing to go
      beyond the American position in the depth of verification regime. The new Soviet position on
      verification not only removed the hurdle that seemed insurmountable, but according to then-U.S.
      Ambassador to the USSR Jack Matlock, became a symbol of the new trust developing in U.S.-Soviet
      relations, which made the treaty and further progress on arms control possible.
      >
      > The documents published here for the first time give the reader a unique and
      never-previously-available opportunity to look into the process of internal deliberations on both
      sides and the negotiations both before and during the summit in December 1987.
      >
      > Visit the Web site of the National Security Archive for more information about today's posting.
      >
      > http://www.nsarchive.org
      >
      > ________________________________________________________
      >
      > THE NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE is an independent non-governmental research institute and library
      located at The George Washington University in Washington, D.C. The Archive collects and publishes
      declassified documents acquired through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). A tax-exempt public
      charity, the Archive receives no U.S. government funding; its budget is supported by publication
      royalties and donations from foundations and individuals.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.