Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

11341Re: [coldwarcomms] Bunker

Expand Messages
  • Blake Bowers
    Jan 29, 2007
    • 0 Attachment
      I agree about the mileage, but did you look at
      the links to the right? Pictures of the airduct
      system (airdrift as they call it) maps, etc. Even
      a video tour from what I presume to be an
      electric cart.

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Matthew S. Smith" <matt@...>
      To: <coldwarcomms@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 11:19 AM
      Subject: Re: [coldwarcomms] Bunker


      > Blake Bowers wrote:
      >
      >> http://www.bbc co.uk/wiltshire/ content/articles /2005/12/
      >> 14/burlington_ nuclear_bunker_ feature.shtml
      >> <http://www.bbc.co.uk/wiltshire/content/articles/2005/12/14/burlington_nuclear_bunker_feature.shtml>
      >>
      >> I don't know if this was posted here before, but this is great.
      >>
      >> Check out the size of the operator console!
      >>
      > Interesting place.
      >
      > Something's fishy with their numbers though. For a place that's "only"
      > 35 acres, having 60 miles of roads makes the roads less than 5 feet
      > wide, and doesn't leave any room for anything else. They say it's over 1
      > km in length (mixing units is rarely a good idea), making it less than
      > 500' wide (on average, probably not strictly rectangular). I can see
      > having a couple of parallel roads running the length with a few
      > connectors, but anything over 4km of roads just makes it a 35 acre
      > parking lot. They don't mention how they get fresh air, but I'm guessing
      > you wouldn't want a lot of vehicles driving around on a regular basis.
      > Or did they have electric cars? Or a trolley system? Not that there was
      > really anywhere to go.
      >
      > Matt
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      >
      >
      >
    • Show all 9 messages in this topic