Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Re: Fighting Joe Hooker and post out of order

Expand Messages
  • melchizedek22
    I think he did OK,certainly not a Mud March or Fredricksburg The Baron-
    Message 1 of 9 , Mar 7 1:03 PM
      I think he did OK,certainly not a Mud March or Fredricksburg
      The Baron-


      -- In civilwarwest@y..., "Tim Harrison" <tharrison@s...> wrote:
      > Baron,
      >
      > Did Burnside do a good job at Knoxville?
      >
      > Regards,
      > Tim Harrison
      > www.swcivilwar.com
      > ----- Original Message -----
      > From: Michael Mason
      > To: civilwarwest@y...
      > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:25 PM
      > Subject: [civilwarwest] Fighting Joe Hooker and post out of order
      >
      >
      > I'm getting some post out of order,I'm getting questions after I answered them.
      > Joe Hooker was a good General,had some bad luck in the East
      > but did good work East and West.
      > A point that has to be made is you can not compare someones
      > performance in the top spot with someones performance
      > in the chain of command.
      > Hooker did good work in the chain of command fell short
      > in the top spot
      > Burnside was terrible in the top spot,a nightmare,did OK sometimes in the chain of command.
      > So Generals who never were in the top spot,we never will no
      > how the would have been,when all the load is on them
      > like Stonewall ,Pat C, we can only assume how they would be
      > The Baron
      >
      > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
      > ADVERTISEMENT
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.