RE: [civilwarwest] Re: Chattanooga
I do so agree, I am a map man from why back, and the lack of maps in "Six
Armies" does make me lose track of what is going on....
From: hank9174 [mailto:clarkc@...]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 10:48 AM
Subject: [civilwarwest] Re: Chattanooga
'Six Armies' offers a concise, well-written explanation of the entire
campaign from Murfreesboro through Tullahoma to Chickamauga back to
Chattanooga and then to Knoxville.
It has good battle detail, explanation of personalties (and
Woodworth calls Polk and Longstreet to task for their insubordination.
He also gives Bragg credit for good strategic thinking rather than
merely blaming his *personality* for the AoT command failures.
My major complaint is that he makes do with only half-a-dozen maps or
- Thnk you, I was under the impression that Cleburne was pretty much alone in the defence of the northern end.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, SDE80@... wrote:
> Well, the whole point of Sherman assaulting the north end of the Ridge was
> to both capture Chickamauga Station and cut Bragg off from Longstreet at
> Knoxville. That, too, would have made MR untenable. Bragg properly
> discerned that was Grant's main effort and concentrated 4 divisions in a
> relatively small area. He counted on the natural strength and defensibility of MR
> to try to hold the rest of it with three divisions. A. P. Stewart's
> division basically had responsibility for three miles of ridge with only enough
> men in a single rank to hold a little over a mile.
> Sam Elliott
> In a message dated 10/25/2010 3:45:37 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> banbruner@... writes:
> I was thinking also of Sherman's force to the north which was much larger
> and much closer to Chickamauga Station.
> Bill Bruner
> --- In email@example.com_ (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)
> , SDE80@ wrote:
> > Bragg would have indeed had a hard time holding MR with a Federal corps
> > (Hooker's "column" had three divisions" at Rossville. Of course, Grant's
> > original plan did not contemplate Hooker being a part of the attack, or
> > having more than one division.
> > Sam Elliott
> > In a message dated 10/25/2010 10:35:20 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> > banbruner@ writes:
> > I am looking forward to a trip in Nov. celebrating the Battle of
> > Chattanooga.
> > Looking the map in preparation, a peculiar thought occurred to me.
> > That once Lookout Mountain and Rossville had been taken Braggs position
> > Missionary Ridge was untenable. With both Lookout and Chattanooga
> > in union control and large forces on both north and southern flanks in
> > position to move to his (Braggs) rear and cut his communications and
> > of retreat he would have been forced to retire after dark on the 15th
> > if no charge had been made on his front.
> > I'm wondering if this analysis has been put forth before or if I am
> > completely wrongheaded.
> > Bill Bruner