Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

RE: [civilwarwest] Re: The viability of Attack in the West versus the East

Expand Messages
  • Tom Mix
    Exactly my point, if I have one. Just a series of pull backs which is a retrograde retreat. One big retreat, just spread out over time and space but the same
    Message 1 of 109 , Jan 1, 2008


      Exactly my point, if I have one.  Just a series of pull bac
      ks which is a retrograde retreat. One big retreat, just spread out over time and space but the same retreat.

       

      -----Original Message-----
      From: civilwarwest@yahoogroups.com [mailto:civilwarwest@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of raymondohara
      Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 3:35 PM
      To: civilwarwest@yahoogroupscom
      Subject: [civilwarwest] Re: The viability of Attack in the West versus the East

       

      --- In civilwarwest@ yahoogroups. com, "Tom Mix" <tmix@...> wrote:

      >
      > The key word this may be your very own: "retrograde" , a
      series of
      retreats
      > rather than one massive retreat with an entrenchment at the end. The
      > closest to that, a single entrenchment, , would have been Corinth but
      that
      > also was temporary as they then continued the retrograde movement.
      >
      > It was a series of retreats but again that is retrograde movement.
      >
      > Tom

      you can also say everywhere they stopped ,even if just overnight
      consitutes a stand and the next day a new retreat.

      they stayed only as long as the union took to arrive, wuth halleck
      that gave them some breathing room.

    • ngreadermail
      I was asking Ray for a source on Jackson. ... versus the East ... ohara@ ... ... 1/2/2008 11:29 AM
      Message 109 of 109 , Jan 2, 2008
        I was asking Ray for a source on Jackson.

        --- In civilwarwest@yahoogroups.com, "Ronald black" <rblack0981@...>
        wrote:
        >
        > Ray;
        > How many sources do you want? Take your pick.
        > Ron
        > ----- Original Message -----
        > From: ngreadermail
        > To: civilwarwest@yahoogroups.com
        > Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 3:45 PM
        > Subject: [civilwarwest] Re: The viability of Attack in the West
        versus the East
        >
        >
        > --- In civilwarwest@yahoogroups.com, "raymondohara" <raymond-
        ohara@>
        > wrote:
        > >
        > > --- In civilwarwest@yahoogroups.com, "Ronald black"
        <rblack0981@>
        > > wrote:
        > > >
        > > > Ray:
        > > > They didn't go to Jackson.
        > > > Ron
        > > >
        > >
        > >
        > > when grant began the next campaign. they were at jackson.
        >
        > Source?
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > --------------------------------------------------------------------
        ----------
        >
        >
        > No virus found in this incoming message.
        > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
        > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1207 - Release Date:
        1/2/2008 11:29 AM
        >
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.