I hope you folks don't think that I like having topics banned in the group.
I ban them because every time we start discussing certain topics that are
emotionally charged there are some, not all by any stretch of the
imagination, but some, that resort to flaming tactics. That is they start
saying rude things about the one that makes a post and not the post itself.
There is a reason for this. When you are face to face with someone, a
facial expression, a body movement, or a voice inflection can, in many
instances, convey a persons feelings without even speaking. This is not
possible in email. It has to be done with the written word. Therein is
where the problems begin. Some put in email what they would never say if
they were face to face with an individual. Just my opinion of course.
Rest assured, a topic will not be banned unless I see that topic cannot be
discussed in a civil manner. The decision to ban a topic is not based on my
personal likes or dislikes. It is based solely on the actions of the group.
I am, very respectfully, your obedient servant,
Dick (a.k.a. Shotgun)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl Williams" <carlw4514@...>
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 5:58 AM
Subject: [civilwarwest] Re: Interesting letter: Sherman to Rawlins, August
>> Interesting that I have been severely criticized for airing this
> opinion in
>> other fora, As Jim aluded to, this is an extremely sensitive subject
>> CSA-leaning folks.
>> Dave Powell
> uh oh, another topic for Shotgun to ban!
> Yahoo! Groups Links