Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Peachtree Creek and The Battle of Atlanta

Expand Messages
  • Eric Jacobson
    Stewart graduated 12th out of, I believe, 56. Honestly, no matter matter what you may think of Hood (and with all deference to Sam Elliott) I don t see how in
    Message 1 of 25 , Jan 4, 2007
    • 0 Attachment
      Stewart graduated 12th out of, I believe, 56. Honestly, no matter
      matter what you may think of Hood (and with all deference to Sam
      Elliott) I don't see how in any way Stewart's experience (brigade,
      division, and corps) in any way supercedes Hood's. Look at Hood's
      track record with Lee and one can make an argument that he may have
      been among the best division commanders the Army of Northern Virginia
      ever had. That is no knock on Stewart, but one has to honestly say
      they were very equal soldiers heading into the spring of 1864. Hood,
      of course, by that stage has serious physical limitations.

      The whole West Point thing, in my opinion, is often way overblown in
      regards to a number of Civil War generals. Consider Hood and the
      issue of demerits. Forever I heard different people state Hood, who
      had 196 demerits in his senior year, was nearly expelled which is
      true. But those same people conveniently neglect to mention that
      John Schofield, his opponent at Franklin, had the EXACT same number
      of demerits. So what does the number prove? Maybe nothing other
      than one liked to drink and smoke and play cards and the other had
      long hair, was tardy, and talked back. No doubt Stewart was an
      intellectual, but that does not in any way indicate that Hood was a

      Also, you may want to study Cassville a bit deeper. Johnston's
      accustaions against Hood are slanted and there is ample evidence that
      Hood was justified in his actions. It is incredible how Hood is
      regularly pinned as the guy who did nothing but attack when he
      doesn't think an attack is wise (Cassville and Gettysburg) he gets
      flack for that, too. No doubt, however, that his decision making at
      Kolb's Farm was not at all good. Hood blundered plain and simple


      --- In civilwarwest@yahoogroups.com, "gnrljejohnston"
      <GnrlJEJohnston@...> wrote:
      > --- In civilwarwest@yahoogroups.com, "Ronald black" <rblack0981@>
      > wrote:
      > >
      > > Eric:
      > >
      > > Please let me eat my words as I find I answered your earlier
      > concerning Hood's command expericience as the situation existed (in
      > September, 1863. I forgot he commanded a corps in summer 1864.
      > this revision, I now rank Hood and Stewart as about equal.
      > And I would rank Stewart above Hood. Not just basing this on corps
      > experience, but overall experience. One has to remember also, that
      > Hood would have flunked out West Point if it hadn't been that his
      > mate tutored him in a couple of subjects including mathematics.
      > room mate was Jamie McPherson. He was not that high in his
      > class whereas (correct me on this Sam) Stewart was close to the top
      > at least in the top ten percent of his class. He was a highly
      > intellectual individual. Stewart was always highly respected by
      > troops despite the nickname of Old Straight that they gave him.
      > was respected by his Texas Brigade for his heroism, but that is
      > basically all. He lamblasted Johnston for not attacking, but yet,
      > let one regiment of mounted infantry scare him into not attacking.
      > Then also, his attacking without intel or without Johnston's
      > at Kolb's farm is totally inexcusable. In addendum, as a career
      > military officer, he knew quite well that to maintain order, the
      > of command must never be broken. He violated that without any
      > JEJ
      > >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.