- --- In email@example.com, Bob Taubman <rtaubman@...> wrote:
>that something else? Oh, sorry, that was a Danish newspaper.
> Was that the book where there are five cartoons of Sherman, or is
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: melchizedek22 <melchizedek22@...>
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 11:17:38 AM
> Subject: [civilwarwest] Re: Castel
> --- In email@example.com, "hank9174" <clarkc@> wrote:
> > --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "melchizedek22"
> > <melchizedek22@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In email@example.com, keeno2@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In a message dated 5/25/2006 1:47:05 PM Central Daylight
> > > > melchizedek22@ writes:I
> > > > I had a spasm!
> > > > Seems we have a sharp disagreement on Castel's book. I read
> > of
> > > it once
> > > > and noted little, but then I was not a critical observer. Do
> > haveHistory
> > > to read the
> > > > whole thing now? And why? What, exactly, is(are) the point(s)
> > > contention
> > > > in that book? Castel is inaccurate? Biased? Mostly wrong?
> > > Should I be
> > > > looking at his next book? Advice, please.
> > > > Ken
> > > >
> > > Biased! BvT
> > Castel pre-empts that in his preface, stating that he came to his
> > conclusions during his research...
> > HankC
> Yeah he came to the conclusion that with so many Pro-Sherman books
> out there,why would anybody buy mine, so I'll right Alternate
> and SELL BOOKS!
> Yahoo! Groups Links