- In a message dated 11/9/2004 11:55:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, ... Bill, Only two books off the top of my head were really pro Johnston. Just read StevenMessage 1 of 35 , Nov 9, 2004View SourceIn a message dated 11/9/2004 11:55:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, billgower@... writes:
. So I guess my question is, has Johnston not been given a fair shake by historians and are there any that portray Johnston in a more favorable light?
Only two books off the top of my head were really pro Johnston. Just read Steven Newton's book on Johnston and his defense on the Peninsula in 1862, and that did bring some points to light here that I do agree with. Very quick read of a book as well, and good argument for Johnston IMHO.
The other, which I have not read, and which for some reason is hard to find, is Craig Symond's bio. of Johnston that came out in 1992. Took forever here to find a a hardback edition fo the book at a decent price, and just got that copy in the mail, and have yet to read it...
Am sure the good General who posts in here, will be able to help more on this subject. :)
Hope all is well.
Regards from the Garden State,
- ... was ... And was made in private conversation, and reported after Lee s death. Funny how so little of those treasured conversations were documented whileMessage 35 of 35 , Nov 12, 2004View Source--- In email@example.com, Jfepperson@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 11/11/2004 6:38:36 PM Eastern Standard Time,was
> illiniillinois@y... writes:
> I agree. And don't forget there was Lee's comment that McClellan
> the best general he had ever faced. I think Grant was playing aAnd was made in private conversation, and reported after Lee's death.
> little tit for tat.
> Except that alleged Lee's comment about McClellan did not come to
> light until after Grant was dead.
Funny how so little of those treasured conversations were documented
while Lee was alive ... :-)