AoNV vs. AoT
- We seem to be saying that the needs/wishes of the AoNV over rode the
needs of the AoT when it came to Longstreet too. Davis knowing that
Lee expected Longstreet & his men back and not wanting to replace
Bragg, did nothing. This is just another case where holding VA was
I agree that Longstreet would not have reversed the tide in the
west. I don't think he would have done as badly at Chatanooga and I
can not see him doing a Spring Hill, Franklin or Nashville. I can
see Davis taking the AoT away from him, when he failed to "stop"
- conveniently, the below excellent article addresses this issue in
decisions made in '63. It was not just the CS generals who needed to
avoid Pyrrhic victories -- in the forbidden zone, unfortunately
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Mark Peters"
> As with many of the CSA commanders, Pyrrhus also didn't know when
> to fight. His campaign, against the Romans, saw him destroy twoCSA
> armies at Heraclea and Asculum, but suffered heavy losses in return.
> This, reputedly, led him to say, "one more such victory and I am
> lost". As indeed he was.
> His first duty was to keep his army as an occupying force, not one
> eventually destroyed by needless heroics. Just as, less numerous
> forces had to be preserved to fight a war of attrition, rather than
> winning costly (but in real terms) meaningless battles.