Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [civilwarwest] Re: Sherman and Shiloh

Expand Messages
  • philip@twinoaks.org
    To: civilwarwest@egroups.com From: josepharose@yahoo.com Date sent: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 17:42:04 -0000 Send reply to:
    Message 1 of 66 , Jan 3, 2001
    • 0 Attachment
      To: civilwarwest@egroups.com
      From: josepharose@...
      Date sent: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 17:42:04 -0000
      Send reply to: civilwarwest@egroups.com
      Subject: [civilwarwest] Re: Sherman and Shiloh

      Joe,
      Quite the contrary, there was an excellent response to Mr.
      Woodbury's post from you. I have been curious to see whether he
      would defend his post, but apparently he has chosen not to do so.
      Philip

      > Michael,
      >
      > Thank you for your kind offer to discuss General Sherman.
      >
      > One area of controversy about Sherman regards the battle at Shiloh.
      > What are your views as to his preparations and subsequent defense?
      >
      > Earlier, a contributor to this e-group offered evidence that Prentiss'
      > action at the "Hornet's Nest" was vastly overrated. I could easily
      > agree that what happened was historically exaggerated, but not to the
      > extent stated. Surprisingly to me, this marked reversal of the
      > conventional wisdom has not evoked any response. Have you heard of
      > this new theory and do you hold any opinion concerning it?
      >
      > Thanks again,
      > Joe
      >
      >
      >
      >
    • oneplez
      Sorry Mr. Weeks, I thought I sent this offline. Don
      Message 66 of 66 , Jan 9, 2006
      • 0 Attachment
        Sorry Mr. Weeks, I thought I sent this offline.

        Don
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.