Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Johnston vs. Hood & Davis

Expand Messages
  • james2044
    The early campaign is as interesting as the TN invasion and is a study in contrast between defensive ideas. Johnston, felt that keeping the AoT intact and a
    Message 1 of 1 , Sep 28, 2003
    • 0 Attachment
      The early campaign is as interesting as the TN invasion and is a
      study in contrast between defensive ideas.

      Johnston, felt that keeping the AoT intact and a threat to Sherman
      was the most important thing. If he could force Sherman to attack
      him, defeat Sherman and counter attack, it might be possible to
      recover the lost area. In truth, he was forced to fall back as
      Sherman used his larger army to flank him out of several positions.
      I seem to remember that someone said he would "retreat to Cuba" if
      left alone.

      Hood & Davis wanted the AoT to "strike a blow" having faith that
      some how Sherman would be beaten and driven back. In truth, the AoT
      lost a large number of men and could not afford to continue
      attacking Sherman at a disadvantage. When this happened, Hood
      abandoned the idea of confronting Sherman and marched north.

      In the end Sherman took Atlanta and was free to "March to the Sea"
      with little danger from the CSA. Hood & Davis' ideas only reduced
      the number of men the AoT had to fight with. An interesting
      question, if Johnston had stayed in command, could he have reduced
      the damage Sherman did? How much of an impact could the AoT had if
      the hung onto Sherman as he marched to the sea?

      James2044
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.