Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: the Battle of Chattanooga , er, the *Battles* of Chattanooga

Expand Messages
  • carlw4514
    I ll take your word for it, Joe, that the first two hardly need be called battles. That makes me feel better, as I sure didnt seem to know anything about them
    Message 1 of 3 , Aug 10 1:37 PM
    • 0 Attachment
      I'll take your word for it, Joe, that the first two hardly need be
      called battles. That makes me feel better, as I sure didnt seem to
      know anything about them [g]
      Carl

      --- In civilwarwest@yahoogroups.com, "hartshje" <Hartshje@a...> wrote:
      > Carl,
      >
      > Where is your usual "[g]" when being tongue-in-cheek? The first
      two
      > listings can hardly be labeled as battles.
      >
      > Joe
      > [g]
      >
      > --- In civilwarwest@yahoogroups.com, "carlw4514" <carlw4514@y...>
      > wrote:
      > > It seems odd to me that the NPS battle summaries at
      > > http://www2.cr.nps.gov/abpp/battles/tvii.htm
      > > list 3 battles of Chattanooga, none known by other names. Thus
      when
      > > referring to the battle of Chattanooga, you need to say which one!
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.