Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Re: [civilwarwest] HOOKING Re: Lunch after ordering an attack

Expand Messages
  • Dick Weeks
    Nope. When a thread is hooked everyone deserves to know the reason. It is not a requirement that they agree with the reason, just that they know it. If one
    Message 1 of 3 , Aug 4, 2003
      Nope. When a thread is hooked everyone deserves to know the reason. It is
      not a requirement that they agree with the reason, just that they know it.
      If one feels a response is necessary after a thread is hooked, private email
      works just fine. .

      I am, very respectfully, your obedient servant,
      Dick (a.k.a. Shotgun)
      http://www.civilwarhome.com

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "caztanzo" <cfsusg@...>
      To: <civilwarwest@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 1:33 PM
      Subject: [civilwarwest] HOOKING Re: Lunch after ordering an attack


      > I do think it's unfair for the moderators to broadcast their version
      > of moderating practices while shutting off responses. No one's above
      > public criticism.
      >
      > Wouldn't it be better simply to hook these threads, period?
      >
      > Just my 2 cents. :)
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
      >
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.