And it's good to see a thoughtful, civil
response to Moe...except that he's no longer around to receive it since he
unsubscribed himself from the group early yesterday morning. Given
his reception here by a few individuals, I wasn't surprised.
For the record, it took me very little
searching to find other contributions (polite and thought provoking) from "Moe
and Wanda" and even a very pleasant photograph of Moe on other CW sites and
Yahoo. Those contributions I found dated back to 2001. Seemed as
genuine as about anyone else I've ever encountered in these types of discussion
groups. But, of course, I too could be wrong.
Again I'll request that all responses to
posts be polite. Refute the historical facts without attacking the
individual posting. Agree to disagree on some subjects where it's
warranted. And you can choose to not respond to those posts which
do not interest you or which you feel would only prolong a fruitless
endeavor. Just please, keep it civil.
If there are further thoughts to be
shared on this matter it would probably be best to make them PRIVATE.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 6:53 AM
Subject: [civilwarwest] Re:
I would like to interject a few ideas at this
stage. I have also been following
the thread and have read Moe's
article. It is quite well written. That being
said, I agree
with many of the posters here that there are some serious
FWIW, I think Moe has presented an interesting idea,
but his conclusions do
not follow from the evidence presented in most
instances. Will Keene and
others have pointed to many of the
assertions with which I also disagree